"Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth."

Welcome to Infoshop News
Friday, May 24 2013 @ 06:12 PM CDT

Open Class Struggle in Wisconsin

News Archive

While less than 10% of the private sector work force is organized in unions in the United States, these unions still represent a potentially massive force in US society, capable of mobilizing millions of workers and youth. This is in the process of being proven in Wisconsin, where the class struggle has broken out into the open.

Open Class Struggle in Wisconsin

by John Reimann
IWW

While less than 10% of the private sector work force is organized in unions in the United States, these unions still represent a potentially massive force in US society, capable of mobilizing millions of workers and youth. This is in the process of being proven in Wisconsin, where the class struggle has broken out into the open.

One-Sided Class Warfare

For the last few decades, it has been almost entirely a one-sided class war. The employers and their political representatives (Republican and Democrat alike) have been conducting a policy of “death by a thousand cuts”. In the work place, workers have seen cuts in benefits, pensions and wages as well as speed-up (often masked by what is called “multi-tasking”). In education, high school students have seen increased class size and elimination of many extra curricular activities while teachers have seen wage cuts and increased work loads. Workers in the public sector have seen lay offs and cuts in benefits and pay while the public has seen reductions in public services.

On and on this wave has rolled, without an apparent response from the working class. What lies behind this wave is a vast redistribution of wealth in the United States, which now has the honor of being the industrialized nation with the greatest economic inequality in the world.

Hundreds of Thousands in the Streets

Now a mass response has developed in Wisconsin, where hundreds of thousands of workers and youth have been mobilized to fight a draconian, union-busting bill that the newly elected Republican governor has proposed. Under this bill, public sector workers would be forced to pay 5.8% of their pay for their pensions and 12.6% towards their health care. One teacher estimated that this would mean a $1,200 cut in monthly pay. Not only that, but this bill would basically eliminate collective bargaining rights for all public sector workers except firefighters and cops.

Unfortunately, the union officials are accepting the pay cuts; where they draw the line is at elimination of collective bargaining rights since this step would mean, in effect, the near elimination of the public sector unions themselves. For the Democrats, this is also a great threat as they receive millions in donations from these unions. Thus it is, then, that these union leaders have mobilized massive protests – up to 100,000 strong – against this bill.

In addition to the public sector workers, many thousands of private sector workers – mainly union workers including construction workers and others - have come out to protest this bill. Thousands of students, including high school students, have also been involved.

Here is one report of the protests of last weekend: “By mid-afternoon over 100,000 had completely surrounded Capitol Square…. For hours they marched and marched around the square, chanting "Kill the Bill" and "Hey, hey, ho, ho, Scott Walker (the governor) has got to go." The public employees union AFSCME called a rally on the Capitol steps at 4 p.m., and tens of thousands stayed until it ended an hour and a half later, even as the temperature sank below zero and the wind picked up…. There were numerous references to the recent protests in Egypt, several noting that while they had forced out a dictator in Cairo while Wisconsin is still saddled with one.” (The http://Internationalist.org)

The far right has been stunned. The Tea Party movement tried to mobilize a counter demonstration, but they were completely dwarfed by the pro-union protesters. The far-right talking head Glenn Beck has been on the air waves pleading that we are not anti-capitalist in the United States.

Democrats

Up until now, the bill has been stalled because the Democratic state senators have left the state. While they don’t have enough votes to vote the bill down, their presence is needed to provide a “quorum” – that is, for enough state senators to be present to allow a vote to be held. These Democrats are bowing to the pressure as well as being extremely worried that if the public sector unions are nearly killed, this will mean a sharp cut in their political donations.

While this mass movement shows the nearly unlimited potential for an open class struggle in the United States, it also demonstrates the weaknesses that still exist. On the one hand, the union leadership has openly said that they accept the wage cuts. (They, the leaders, will not be taking such cuts in pay themselves.) Also, much has been made of the fact that most private sector workers pay this same amount for their benefits – if they have any benefits at all. Walker and the Republicans are playing on this, saying why should these public sector workers have it so much better than the private sector ones? Given the present consciousness in the United States, it is likely that this theme will resonate with some workers in the state.

Alternative

There is an alternative.

The union leadership should break from the dictates of the Democratic politicians and openly oppose any pay cuts by any means. At the same time, they should explain that if public sector workers take a cut in pay, this will only lead to further pay cuts in the private sector, especially for non-union workers. This is the infamous “race to the bottom”. Instead, this mass mobilization should be turned into an organizing campaign throughout the state – amongst secretaries, store clerks and salespeople, coffee shop workers and factory workers, etc. The demand should be for the employers to fully pay for full health benefits for all employees and their families as well as to fully pay for a decent pension (including health benefits) for all retirees.

Nobody can expect that workers in Wisconsin can win such advances in isolation. However, a movement like this would quickly spread throughout the United States.

Where the Money Is

Of course, a howl will go up that they cannot afford this. In answer, the workers’ movement can point to the over $2 trillion in cash and other liquid assets that Corporate America is sitting on at present. (source: Wall St. Journal, 2/19/11) They can point to the fact that the top one percent of U.S. households owns 37.1% of all private assets in the nation, which comes out to $20 trillion. The top 10% owns 70%, or about $38 trillion. (source: Citizens for Tax Justice)

It is not likely that the union officialdom will make this break with their Democratic masters, even in this heated situation. However, there are small forces within this mass movement (and a mass movement it is) which could start to implement such a campaign. Students and others new to the struggle would be especially open to this approach. It would not take much to mobilize just a few hundred to take up this campaign amongst private sector workers. They could start with those most accessible such as store clerks and salespeople and workers in coffee shops and restaurants. Teams of ten or twenty activists could go into the stores with a leaflet explaining this campaign and talk with the workers. (Note: Of course, the management would try to kick them out, but by the time they succeeded the “damage” would have already been done.) Simultaneously, they could explain what they are doing within the wider movement and urge the movement as a whole to take up this approach.

Already, there is some discussion within the movement for a general strike call in the state. However, for this call to be really effective, it must draw in the non-union majority of workers. The above approach is how this can be accomplished.

From the Defensive to the Offensive

Workers in the United States have seen a massive redistribution of wealth upwards in recent decades. In this way, a campaign could be started to reverse this process and redistribute the wealth downwards. In this way, a start could be made to turn this defensive struggle onto the offensive.

http://www.iww.org/en/node/5350

Share
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Ask
  • Kirtsy
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Twitter
  • SlashDot
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Fark
  • Del.icio.us
  • Blogmarks
  • Yahoo Buzz
Open Class Struggle in Wisconsin | 10 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
Open Class Struggle in Wisconsin
Authored by: frederik on Thursday, February 24 2011 @ 09:59 PM CST

As much as I would want to believe that there is "Open Class Struggle in Wisconson" right now I have to agree that public employees do constitute an elite class of workers. I find it strange that the IWW, the champion of unskilled workers are the ones talking about the radical potential in these protests because if anyone should know that skilled workers don't give a damn about the poor and unskilled it should be the Wobblies, its why they were formed in the first place. I'm writing this from the San Fransisco Bay Area where a public employee can retire with near six figures and use the power of the union to insure that their comfortable position is retained and are fine with screwing over anyone else in the process. I'm not saying that public employees shouldn't have the right to collectivley bargain but I think its a sad day when the Wobblies are calling appeals by police, prison guards and tenured teachers to politicians "class struggle".

[ # ]
Open Class Struggle in Wisconsin
Authored by: Dead End on Friday, February 25 2011 @ 12:23 AM CST

So based off your wonderful class analysis, if someone in management makes far less than a public employee, they are closer to the type of folks we should be involved in struggle with?

Income has nothing to do with class. Benefits has nothing to do with class. There is no labor "aristocracy" and I think it's hilarious that many American anarchists parrot basically the same lines that Fox News, Walker and big buisness does. But on the other hand, I don't think ya'll have much to offer either, so by all means, don't get interested in any of this stuff, stick to the IMF protests and whatnot.

[ # ]
Open Class Struggle in Wisconsin
Authored by: veranasi on Friday, February 25 2011 @ 03:13 AM CST

Edit:Fuck it. I shouldn't  have to explain to you.

 

Edited on Friday, February 25 2011 @ 03:40 AM CST by veranasi
[ # ]
Open Class Struggle in Wisconsin
Authored by: frederik on Friday, February 25 2011 @ 03:44 AM CST

Being raised by a member of a teachers union I know that public employees aren't part of an "aristocracy", what I'm saying is that I don't agree with the analysis in this article that protests by public employees have a radical potential to help all working people, they use what power they have to protect their own interests. Contrary to what you say Anarchists are interested in class and worker struggle but recognize labor unions can be as bureaucratic and reactionary as any other institution. 

[ # ]
Open Class Struggle in Wisconsin
Authored by: veranasi on Friday, February 25 2011 @ 03:31 AM CST

Poor and unskilled, right?

It's not our grandparents' One Big Union, anymore. It's run by the grandchildren of strike-breakers and pinkertons.

So, poor people are assholes if they don't fit a specific motif.

 

 

[ # ]
Open Class Struggle in Wisconsin
Authored by: Nik on Friday, February 25 2011 @ 10:49 AM CST

I usually don't comment online, but I am getting SO sick of the bullshit a lot of anarchists are posting about what's goin down in Wisconsin that I guess it's time to write something (I've probably just been reading too many of the comments at anarchist news...).

So, frederik, first I'm going to point out how ridiculous your entire post is, and then I'm going to offer my own opinion about the entire anarchist discourse (that I've read, at least) surrounding the union protests.

frederik - Your first sentence says: As much as I would want to believe that there is "Open Class Struggle in Wisconson" right now I have to agree that public employees do constitute an elite class of workers.

There seem to be a couple points you are trying (and failing) to make here.  The first, by implication, is that the situation in Wisconsin is not class struggle (or, at least, not open class struggle).  The second point, again, kind of by implication, that you seem to be making here is that "elite" workers either cannot engage in class struggle, are on the "wrong" side of class struggle, or are just not worthy of anarchists' support in any situation.

To address your first point: you must have a weird understanding of class, but I always thought that, to be really simplistic, there are workers who have to sell their labor/time/bodies for a wage to survive; there are bosses who manage the wage slaves; and there are capitalists who own the whole outfit.  Right now, in Wisconsin, there are wage laborers collectively "struggling" against harsh measures being imposed by managers and capitalists to reduce their pay and benefites and maybe even take away their right to collectively struggle in the first place.  This seems to be basically the textbook definition of class struggle.  Just because they aren't killing people or burning down buildings or listening to From the Depths or some shit doesn't mean it's not happening.  Sorry everyone in Wisonsin doesn't fit your vision of the perfect revolutionary.  Fuck em, I guess, right?

To your second point: what exactly is an elite class of workers?  A group of people that make a lot of money and get good benefits?  So, regardless of one's social role, we should just say fuck off if they make enough money?  What's your cutoff then?  There has to be some dividing line, right?  Ridiculous.  We live in a capitalist society - if some workers have managed to squeak out a sizable income because of a union, good for fucking them!  I wish everyday that I got paid enough to actually go grocery shopping or afford health insurance.  I would join a union at my workplace in a second if it meant I could get those things and remain a worker.  The state's not gonna wither away tomorrow...we still gotta fucking survive!  If workers can get better living conditions while we are still stuck under the boot of capitalism, fantastic!  No one has any illusions that this is going to lead to some glorious revolution or something, but it's cashmoney mothafucka!  Easier than robbin a bank, and in the end it's just as painful, if not moreso, to the capitalists.

Your second sentence: I find it strange that the IWW, the champion of unskilled workers are the ones talking about the radical potential in these protests because if anyone should know that skilled workers don't give a damn about the poor and unskilled it should be the Wobblies...

frederik - So you know how everyone in Wisconsin feels about "poor and unskilled" workers?  Of course you do; you're an anarchist, therefore you are cleared to speak for other people, right?  Furthermore, have you considered that if anti-union measures are successful in this case, then "poor and unskilled" workers are probably going to be even more fucked than they are now?  Also, you really should define what you mean by "elite" and "poor and unskilled" workers.  Give me a real cutoff and qualifications.  I have a feeling that someone fell asleep with Fox News on...

One last thing for you, frederik.  In your last sentence you say: I'm not saying that public employees shouldn't have the right to collectivley bargain but I think its a sad day when the Wobblies are calling appeals by police, prison guards and tenured teachers...

frederik, you just lumped police and prison guards in with teachers.  TEACHERS?!?!?!? Fuck you.  Seriously, fuck you.  You clearly don't understand the details of the situation in Wisconsin, and only a psychopath would put teachers in the same category as police and prison guards.  Say all you want about institutionalized education, racist and patriarchal history from the imperialists' perspective, the function of public education being to train obedient wage slaves, etc...but teachers are not in the same category as cops and prison guards, and that should not be implied.

Anyway, a couple thoughts on the general anarchist discourse (again, only stuff I've read, and maybe too heavily influenced by online comments):

I get so disgusted with the anti-union sentiment that is constantly thrown around.  Most of the critiques I've read about unions and union bureaucracies are dead-on and I completely agree with, but that doesn't mean that the workers that make up those unions aren't worthy of support when they try to, at the very least, maintain their standard of living for themselves and their families.  Just because union heirarchies are fucked doesn't mean that we shouldn't support people fighting to keep a larger portion of the shit their labor produces.  That's crazy.  I totally and completely reject the idea that conditions somehow need to "get worse" for people to "wake up" or something and join our glorious struggle.  That's manipulative, sadistic, kinda Leninist, and just not accurate at all.

I work with kids with Autism, and working conditions for direct care staff are shit.  Most of us don't get health insurance; we get paid damn near minumum wage; we never get enough training; to be just an adequate staff one has to do countless hours of unpaid work at home; and the list goes on and on and on.  I don't care how fucked up it could be - if a union existed that could make my life a little better, I would fight for it.  Not because it's going to overthrow capitalism by itself, and not because it's the most "pure" activity an anarchist can engage in, but because it makes my life, my friend's lives, and my families lives a little better, right here right now, and it doesn't require me to become a manager or a capitalist - it just helps me retain a larger chunk of the value of my labor in a capitalist economy.  Not anywhere close to perfect, but better than nothing.   I hate being poor.  I mean I really, really fucking hate being poor, and I hate having bosses.  There's nothing cool or hip or "real" about it, and anything that potentially helps out without fucking over other workers or proles or requiring me to be a capitalist (and hey, maybe even building class power and solidarity and community) is worth fighting for.

I have a feeling that a lot of the people that bash unions are the same people that are always all like "steal from the register, man!  take your bonuses from the safe!"  I don't understand how this is any more desirable than fighting with a union.  In both cases, one is fighting back against the capitalists by taking a larger share of their labor/time/wealth/whatever back.  In both cases, compromises are made because we live in a capitalist world (accepting the value of their currency, for instance).  A union just makes the fight a social activity and (hopefully) builds class power and solidarity, while stealing from the register (at least every time I or my friends have done it) is just an isolated and kinda anti-social thing that usually necessitates lying to one's coworkers (and sometimes bosses taking punitive action against all the workers because of one person's haul).  Not that there's anything intrinsically wrong with stealing from the register, but it just usually doesn't create an anti-boss/capitalist atmosphere (at least not in my experience - maybe I was doing it wrong). 

Fuck union bureaucracies and all their compromises, but from someone who has never even had the choice to be in a union, we need every weapon we can get.

Anyway, if I ever manage to get better working conditions for myself and all my friends that do direct care for kids with cognitive disabilities (and they will always need care in some form from some community of people, regardless of whether we live in a capitalist society or not) and then the bosses/capitalists try to take it away - anyone that isn't on my side when we fight is just that, I guess.  Not on the same side as me.  Same goes for the folks up in Wisconsin - even if they're not struggling to overthrow capitalism/the logic of capital right now with every action they take, I hope every worker can get as much as they possibly can from the capitalists any way they can while we're still stuck under capitalism.  Anybody that's not down with that isn't on the same side as me, I guess. 

Nik

[ # ]
Open Class Struggle in Wisconsin
Authored by: lettersjournal on Friday, February 25 2011 @ 09:44 PM CST

frederik, you just lumped police and prison guards in with teachers.  TEACHERS?!?!?!? Fuck you.  Seriously, fuck you.  You clearly don't understand the details of the situation in Wisconsin, and only a psychopath would put teachers in the same category as police and prison guards.  Say all you want about institutionalized education, racist and patriarchal history from the imperialists' perspective, the function of public education being to train obedient wage slaves, etc...but teachers are not in the same category as cops and prison guards, and that should not be implied.

I think the distinction you're drawing between teachers and cops/prison guards is a moral one.  I would say that they are in the same economic category (along with social workers), but not because they are 'bad' or 'mean to kids' or 'oppressive' or something.

Here's why: the role of teachers is managerial (they manage students and pass along capitalist ideology), they are paid salaries rather than hourly wages, and their interests on the job are muddled (their struggles do not attack the economy but protect their professional position within it, and their struggles are also in contradiction with the interests of children).  Teachers are middle class, not proletarian.  Their positions require specialized schooling, they are salaried, not wage workers, and they are managers.

That said, good luck to them!  Many teachers are nice people, and they are trampled by this society like everyone else.  But like doctors, scientists, social workers, police, librarians, and so on... teachers are not working class.  I think this conflation of workers and managers is largely due to the fact that most pro-revolutionaries are managers of some sort.

From elsewhere:

The only controversy here is how many of us within the pro-revolutionary milieu are actually employed as social managers and, no surprise, how we use our work-skills to both manage the milieu and theoretically force through strategies which conflate the interest of managers with workers. I can only assume this strategy is pursued because it is too painful to acknowledge that as social managers (and as pro-revolutionaries) we are not members of that class which we think must overthrow capitalism. Certainly in the '60's and '70's there were social managers who were able to undertake a critique of their privileged role... the situation has certainly declined since then.

[ # ]
Open Class Struggle in Wisconsin
Authored by: veranasi on Saturday, February 26 2011 @ 05:33 AM CST

Okay, Dead End, we'll just let letters explain it to you?

 

Anyway, there's a logical whole in a lot of Leftist analysis of class surrounding these protests.  Wage/salaried earners vs. those who own capital.

The day laborer for all intents and purposes is an independent contractor. Which I suppose we can call the petit bourgeoisie. There are CEOs who work for wage/salary. They work for investors, who I guess are the property owners (the Bourgeois). These investors are frequently union pensions. So! The CEO (proletariat) works for the unions, (bourgeoisie) and apparently the day laborer (petit bourgeoisie) should just accept that they are equal or more privileged that than the CEO (proletariat). Just a thought.

 

PS. I love teachers and librarians. Esp. librarians.

 

[ # ]
Open Class Struggle in Wisconsin
Authored by: frederik on Saturday, February 26 2011 @ 12:11 AM CST

My comment on the article was not that because people in Wisconsin "aren't killing people or burning down buildings or listening to From the Depths" that there wasn't anything going on. Your totally right that the sentence "skilled workers don't give a damn about the poor and unskilled" was poorly constructed and did give the impression I felt the right to speak for other people. What I was trying to get across about the IWW though, was that the reason the Wobblies were originally formed is that unskilled workers realized that there was a big difference between a machinist  who was part of the AFL and had a skill which was needed and a person working somewhere like a garmet factory who could be easily replaced, that there was more nuance than just an owning and working class because certain members of the working class had a vested interests in propagating the status quo. I mentioned prison guard unions because they use their power and money, at least in California, to support "tough on crime measures" so more poor working class people get thrown in jail and they can insure the protection of their jobs. Although a prison guard and some guy trying to get by washing dishes who gets thrown in jail for having a joint aren't members of the ruling class they have completely dissimilar and antagonistic interests.  As you say I "lumped police and prison guards in with teachers.  TEACHERS?!?!?!? Fuck you.  Seriously, fuck you." And like lettersjournal mentioned I wasn't trying to make a moral judgement on teachers, like I said being raised by a single mother and member of a teachers union I have directly benefited from them, but the function of teacher's unions is to protect tenured teachers, even if they're doing a horrible job educating students. So if your a poor student who drops out of school because your tenured teachers are all uninspired  and bad at their jobs you then have to deal with trying to make a living without a GED, I think it again shows that public employee unions and the interests of other working people can be antagonistic. I guess the overarching point i'm trying to make is that in my opinion unions aren't always something that "helps people without fucking over other workers or proles" of course public employees should have the right to collectively bargain but I think if you look at how public employee unions have wielded their power the analysis of this article that they can be a force for radicalization doesn't hold up.

As to your point that "Just because union heirarchies are fucked doesn't mean that we shouldn't support people fighting to keep a larger portion of the shit their labor produces.  That's crazy.  I totally and completely reject the idea that conditions somehow need to "get worse" for people to "wake up" or something and join our glorious struggle.  That's manipulative, sadistic, kinda Leninist, and just not accurate at all." I agree, and i'm glad you responded to this because as someone still in high school who hasn't really had to work much in his life I can sometimes disregard how hard it is to make a decent living and instead impatiently demand something more revolutionary so I appreciate giving me a lot to think about.

[ # ]
Open Class Struggle in Wisconsin
Authored by: veranasi on Friday, February 25 2011 @ 03:16 AM CST

PS I whole heartedly support WI labor!!! Just not this other bullshit.

 

 

[ # ]