Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth

Welcome to Infoshop News
Thursday, September 02 2010 @ 02:21 PM UTC

Statement put out by man who crashed plane into IRS office in Austin, Texas

CapitalismA plane crashed into a Northwest Austin building that houses federal offices including an IRS office at about 9:30 this morning. According to federal officials, the pilot had set his home ablaze before intentionally crashing plane into the building. The brutality that the capitalist system inflicted on him and inflicts on poor and working class people brought him to consider this his last option. He posted this note on the internet before his final departure. Editor’s note: We found this note on a Web site being pointed at by social media users. A search showed the domain that the note was posted on is registered to Joe Stack of San Marcos. A man by the same name, who has addresses in both Austin and San Marcos has been linked to today’s airplane crash.

If you’re reading this, you’re no doubt asking yourself, “Why did this have to happen?” The simple truth is that it is complicated and has been coming for a long time. The writing process, started many months ago, was intended to be therapy in the face of the looming realization that there isn’t enough therapy in the world that can fix what is really broken. Needless to say, this rant could fill volumes with example after example if I would let it. I find the process of writing it frustrating, tedious, and probably pointless… especially given my gross inability to gracefully articulate my thoughts in light of the storm raging in my head. Exactly what is therapeutic about that I’m not sure, but desperate times call for desperate measures.

We are all taught as children that without laws there would be no society, only anarchy. Sadly, starting at early ages we in this country have been brainwashed to believe that, in return for our dedication and service, our government stands for justice for all. We are further brainwashed to believe that there is freedom in this place, and that we should be ready to lay our lives down for the noble principals represented by its founding fathers. Remember? One of these was “no taxation without representation”. I have spent the total years of my adulthood unlearning that crap from only a few years of my childhood. These days anyone who really stands up for that principal is promptly labeled a “crackpot”, traitor and worse.

While very few working people would say they haven’t had their fair share of taxes (as can I), in my lifetime I can say with a great degree of certainty that there has never been a politician cast a vote on any matter with the likes of me or my interests in mind. Nor, for that matter, are they the least bit interested in me or anything I have to say.

Why is it that a handful of thugs and plunderers can commit unthinkable atrocities (and in the case of the GM executives, for scores of years) and when it’s time for their gravy train to crash under the weight of their gluttony and overwhelming stupidity, the force of the full federal government has no difficulty coming to their aid within days if not hours? Yet at the same time, the joke we call the American medical system, including the drug and insurance companies, are murdering tens of thousands of people a year and stealing from the corpses and victims they cripple, and this country’s leaders don’t see this as important as bailing out a few of their vile, rich cronies. Yet, the political “representatives” (thieves, liars, and self-serving scumbags is far more accurate) have endless time to sit around for year after year and debate the state of the “terrible health care problem”. It’s clear they see no crisis as long as the dead people don’t get in the way of their corporate profits rolling in.

And justice? You’ve got to be kidding!

How can any rational individual explain that white elephant conundrum in the middle of our tax system and, indeed, our entire legal system? Here we have a system that is, by far, too complicated for the brightest of the master scholars to understand. Yet, it mercilessly “holds accountable” its victims, claiming that they’re responsible for fully complying with laws not even the experts understand. The law “requires” a signature on the bottom of a tax filing; yet no one can say truthfully that they understand what they are signing; if that’s not “duress” than what is. If this is not the measure of a totalitarian regime, nothing is.
How did I get here?

My introduction to the real American nightmare starts back in the early ‘80s. Unfortunately after more than 16 years of school, somewhere along the line I picked up the absurd, pompous notion that I could read and understand plain English. Some friends introduced me to a group of people who were having ‘tax code’ readings and discussions. In particular, zeroed in on a section relating to the wonderful “exemptions” that make institutions like the vulgar, corrupt Catholic Church so incredibly wealthy. We carefully studied the law (with the help of some of the “best”, high-paid, experienced tax lawyers in the business), and then began to do exactly what the “big boys” were doing (except that we weren’t steeling from our congregation or lying to the government about our massive profits in the name of God). We took a great deal of care to make it all visible, following all of the rules, exactly the way the law said it was to be done.

The intent of this exercise and our efforts was to bring about a much-needed re-evaluation of the laws that allow the monsters of organized religion to make such a mockery of people who earn an honest living. However, this is where I learned that there are two “interpretations” for every law; one for the very rich, and one for the rest of us… Oh, and the monsters are the very ones making and enforcing the laws; the inquisition is still alive and well today in this country.

That little lesson in patriotism cost me $40,000+, 10 years of my life, and set my retirement plans back to 0. It made me realize for the first time that I live in a country with an ideology that is based on a total and complete lie. It also made me realize, not only how naive I had been, but also the incredible stupidity of the American public; that they buy, hook, line, and sinker, the crap about their “freedom”… and that they continue to do so with eyes closed in the face of overwhelming evidence and all that keeps happening in front of them.

Before even having to make a shaky recovery from the sting of the first lesson on what justice really means in this country (around 1984 after making my way through engineering school and still another five years of “paying my dues”), I felt I finally had to take a chance of launching my dream of becoming an independent engineer.

On the subjects of engineers and dreams of independence, I should digress somewhat to say that I’m sure that I inherited the fascination for creative problem solving from my father. I realized this at a very young age.

The significance of independence, however, came much later during my early years of college; at the age of 18 or 19 when I was living on my own as student in an apartment in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. My neighbor was an elderly retired woman (80+ seemed ancient to me at that age) who was the widowed wife of a retired steel worker. Her husband had worked all his life in the steel mills of central Pennsylvania with promises from big business and the union that, for his 30 years of service, he would have a pension and medical care to look forward to in his retirement. Instead he was one of the thousands who got nothing because the incompetent mill management and corrupt union (not to mention the government) raided their pension funds and stole their retirement. All she had was social security to live on.

In retrospect, the situation was laughable because here I was living on peanut butter and bread (or Ritz crackers when I could afford to splurge) for months at a time. When I got to know this poor figure and heard her story I felt worse for her plight than for my own (I, after all, I thought I had everything to in front of me). I was genuinely appalled at one point, as we exchanged stories and commiserated with each other over our situations, when she in her grandmotherly fashion tried to convince me that I would be “healthier” eating cat food (like her) rather than trying to get all my substance from peanut butter and bread. I couldn’t quite go there, but the impression was made. I decided that I didn’t trust big business to take care of me, and that I would take responsibility for my own future and myself.

Return to the early ‘80s, and here I was off to a terrifying start as a ‘wet-behind-the-ears’ contract software engineer… and two years later, thanks to the fine backroom, midnight effort by the sleazy executives of Arthur Andersen (the very same folks who later brought us Enron and other such calamities) and an equally sleazy New York Senator (Patrick Moynihan), we saw the passage of 1986 tax reform act with its section 1706.

For you who are unfamiliar, here is the core text of the IRS Section 1706, defining the treatment of workers (such as contract engineers) for tax purposes. Visit this link for a conference committee report (http://www.synergistech.com/1706.shtm...tteeReport) regarding the intended interpretation of Section 1706 and the relevant parts of Section 530, as amended. For information on how these laws affect technical services workers and their clients, read our discussion here (http://www.synergistech.com/ic-taxlaw.shtml).

SEC. 1706. TREATMENT OF CERTAIN TECHNICAL PERSONNEL.

(a) IN GENERAL - Section 530 of the Revenue Act of 1978 is amended by adding at the end thereof the following new subsection:
(d) EXCEPTION. - This section shall not apply in the case of an individual who pursuant to an arrangement between the taxpayer and another person, provides services for such other person as an engineer, designer, drafter, computer programmer, systems analyst, or other similarly skilled worker engaged in a similar line of work.

(b) EFFECTIVE DATE. - The amendment made by this section shall apply to remuneration paid and services rendered after December 31, 1986.
Note:

· “another person” is the client in the traditional job-shop relationship.

· “taxpayer” is the recruiter, broker, agency, or job shop.

· “individual”, “employee”, or “worker” is you.

Admittedly, you need to read the treatment to understand what it is saying but it’s not very complicated. The bottom line is that they may as well have put my name right in the text of section (d). Moreover, they could only have been more blunt if they would have came out and directly declared me a criminal and non-citizen slave. Twenty years later, I still can’t believe my eyes.
During 1987, I spent close to $5000 of my ‘pocket change’, and at least 1000 hours of my time writing, printing, and mailing to any senator, congressman, governor, or slug that might listen; none did, and they universally treated me as if I was wasting their time. I spent countless hours on the L.A. freeways driving to meetings and any and all of the disorganized professional groups who were attempting to mount a campaign against this atrocity. This, only to discover that our efforts were being easily derailed by a few moles from the brokers who were just beginning to enjoy the windfall from the new declaration of their “freedom”. Oh, and don’t forget, for all of the time I was spending on this, I was loosing income that I couldn’t bill clients.

After months of struggling it had clearly gotten to be a futile exercise. The best we could get for all of our trouble is a pronouncement from an IRS mouthpiece that they weren’t going to enforce that provision (read harass engineers and scientists). This immediately proved to be a lie, and the mere existence of the regulation began to have its impact on my bottom line; this, of course, was the intended effect.

Again, rewind my retirement plans back to 0 and shift them into idle. If I had any sense, I clearly should have left abandoned engineering and never looked back.
Instead I got busy working 100-hour workweeks. Then came the L.A. depression of the early 1990s. Our leaders decided that they didn’t need the all of those extra Air Force bases they had in Southern California, so they were closed; just like that. The result was economic devastation in the region that rivaled the widely publicized Texas S&L fiasco. However, because the government caused it, no one gave a shit about all of the young families who lost their homes or street after street of boarded up houses abandoned to the wealthy loan companies who received government funds to “shore up” their windfall. Again, I lost my retirement.

Years later, after weathering a divorce and the constant struggle trying to build some momentum with my business, I find myself once again beginning to finally pick up some speed. Then came the .COM bust and the 911 nightmare. Our leaders decided that all aircraft were grounded for what seemed like an eternity; and long after that, ‘special’ facilities like San Francisco were on security alert for months. This made access to my customers prohibitively expensive. Ironically, after what they had done the Government came to the aid of the airlines with billions of our tax dollars … as usual they left me to rot and die while they bailed out their rich, incompetent cronies WITH MY MONEY! After these events, there went my business but not quite yet all of my retirement and savings.
By this time, I’m thinking that it might be good for a change. Bye to California, I’ll try Austin for a while. So I moved, only to find out that this is a place with a highly inflated sense of self-importance and where damn little real engineering work is done. I’ve never experienced such a hard time finding work. The rates are 1/3 of what I was earning before the crash, because pay rates here are fixed by the three or four large companies in the area who are in collusion to drive down prices and wages… and this happens because the justice department is all on the take and doesn’t give a fuck about serving anyone or anything but themselves and their rich buddies.

To survive, I was forced to cannibalize my savings and retirement, the last of which was a small IRA. This came in a year with mammoth expenses and not a single dollar of income. I filed no return that year thinking that because I didn’t have any income there was no need. The sleazy government decided that they disagreed. But they didn’t notify me in time for me to launch a legal objection so when I attempted to get a protest filed with the court I was told I was no longer entitled to due process because the time to file ran out. Bend over for another $10,000 helping of justice.

So now we come to the present. After my experience with the CPA world, following the business crash I swore that I’d never enter another accountant’s office again. But here I am with a new marriage and a boatload of undocumented income, not to mention an expensive new business asset, a piano, which I had no idea how to handle. After considerable thought I decided that it would be irresponsible NOT to get professional help; a very big mistake.

When we received the forms back I was very optimistic that they were in order. I had taken all of the years information to Bill Ross, and he came back with results very similar to what I was expecting. Except that he had neglected to include the contents of Sheryl’s unreported income; $12,700 worth of it. To make matters worse, Ross knew all along this was missing and I didn’t have a clue until he pointed it out in the middle of the audit. By that time it had become brutally evident that he was representing himself and not me.

This left me stuck in the middle of this disaster trying to defend transactions that have no relationship to anything tax-related (at least the tax-related transactions were poorly documented). Things I never knew anything about and things my wife had no clue would ever matter to anyone. The end result is… well, just look around.

I remember reading about the stock market crash before the “great” depression and how there were wealthy bankers and businessmen jumping out of windows when they realized they screwed up and lost everything. Isn’t it ironic how far we’ve come in 60 years in this country that they now know how to fix that little economic problem; they just steal from the middle class (who doesn’t have any say in it, elections are a joke) to cover their asses and it’s “business-as-usual”. Now when the wealthy fuck up, the poor get to die for the mistakes… isn’t that a clever, tidy solution.

As government agencies go, the FAA is often justifiably referred to as a tombstone agency, though they are hardly alone. The recent presidential puppet GW Bush and his cronies in their eight years certainly reinforced for all of us that this criticism rings equally true for all of the government. Nothing changes unless there is a body count (unless it is in the interest of the wealthy sows at the government trough). In a government full of hypocrites from top to bottom, life is as cheap as their lies and their self-serving laws.

I know I’m hardly the first one to decide I have had all I can stand. It has always been a myth that people have stopped dying for their freedom in this country, and it isn’t limited to the blacks, and poor immigrants. I know there have been countless before me and there are sure to be as many after. But I also know that by not adding my body to the count, I insure nothing will change. I choose to not keep looking over my shoulder at “big brother” while he strips my carcass, I choose not to ignore what is going on all around me, I choose not to pretend that business as usual won’t continue; I have just had enough.

I can only hope that the numbers quickly get too big to be white washed and ignored that the American zombies wake up and revolt; it will take nothing less. I would only hope that by striking a nerve that stimulates the inevitable double standard, knee-jerk government reaction that results in more stupid draconian restrictions people wake up and begin to see the pompous political thugs and their mindless minions for what they are. Sadly, though I spent my entire life trying to believe it wasn’t so, but violence not only is the answer, it is the only answer. The cruel joke is that the really big chunks of shit at the top have known this all along and have been laughing, at and using this awareness against, fools like me all along.

I saw it written once that the definition of insanity is repeating the same process over and over and expecting the outcome to suddenly be different. I am finally ready to stop this insanity. Well, Mr. Big Brother IRS man, let’s try something different; take my pound of flesh and sleep well.

The communist creed: From each according to his ability, to each according to his need.

The capitalist creed: From each according to his gullibility, to each according to his greed.

Joe Stack (1956-2010)
02/18/2010

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/...tack1.html
Share
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Ask
  • Kirtsy
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Twitter
  • SlashDot
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Fark
  • Del.icio.us
  • Blogmarks
  • Yahoo Buzz

Trackback

Trackback URL for this entry: http://news.infoshop.org/trackback.php?id=20100218185823781

Here's what others have to say about 'Statement put out by man who crashed plane into IRS office in Austin, Texas':

Social comments and analytics for this post from uberVU - social comments
This post was mentioned on Twitter by anarchistnews: Statement put out by man who crashed plane into IRS office in Austin, Texas http://su.pr/1zaalx #austin #texas #capitalism #irs [read more]
Tracked on Friday, February 19 2010 @ 06:24 AM UTC

http://www.sbpress.com/2010/02/joe-stack-a-misguided-missile/
[...] My motto is “take the best and leave the rest”. Joe Stack’s “manifesto” can be found here . While he’s no Noam Chomsky, Stack exhibits a strong understanding of the failures of the state as well as the [...] [read more]
Tracked on Friday, February 19 2010 @ 06:33 PM UTC

Statement put out by man who crashed plane into IRS office in … | LATEST UPDATED BLOG
[...] if (PopupWin_bouncelimit Statement put out by man who crashed plane into IRS office in … Related Hot Posts Statement put out by man who crashed plane into IRS office in … Breaking News – “HOMEGROWN TERROR” – Austin Plane Crash by [...] [read more]
Tracked on Friday, February 19 2010 @ 10:36 PM UTC

Attack the System » Blog Archive » Updated News Digest February 20-21, 2009
[...]                                                                -C. Wright Mills Statement Put Out by Man Who Crashed Plane Into IRS Headquarters in Austin, Texas  (Me and the IRS by Johnny Paycheck) Is Joe Stack a Wake-Up Call to America?  by [...] [read more]
Tracked on Saturday, February 20 2010 @ 11:27 AM UTC

Statement put out by man who crashed plane into IRS office in Austin, Texas | 37 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
Statement put out by man who crashed plane into IRS office in Austin, Texas
Authored by: kindness on Thursday, February 18 2010 @ 07:55 PM UTC
he tried to save us.
Statement put out by man who crashed plane into IRS office in Austin, Texas
Authored by: AntiOedipus on Thursday, February 18 2010 @ 07:59 PM UTC
Chilling. Beautiful, and sad.

RIP.
Edited on Thursday, February 18 2010 @ 08:01 PM UTC by AntiOedipus
Statement put out by man who crashed plane into IRS office in Austin, Texas
Authored by: RanDomino on Friday, February 19 2010 @ 06:28 AM UTC

A tragic hero for our time.

Statement put out by man who crashed plane into IRS office in Austin, Texas
Authored by: FrankC on Thursday, February 18 2010 @ 09:18 PM UTC
fucking angry old white man. murderer, psychopath, fucking idiot. fuck you. burn in hell.
Statement put out by man who crashed plane into IRS office in Austin, Texas
Authored by: HPWombat on Thursday, February 18 2010 @ 10:26 PM UTC
Thanks for sharing. My two cents are this guy was fucking awesome and by "fucking awesome" I mean totally sweet. Manifesto comes from someone with a rudimentary understanding of political jargon, but succeeds in exposing the calamities that brought him to take such an action. He is a legitimate actor that exposed many things about our current system that receive little exposure. While he focuses a great deal of his attention on the loss of faith in the ideal America, he doesn't place blame strongly beyond the government. While this manifesto comes from what seems a populist direction, he ends it with a desire for revolt, quotes the communist maxim and mocks capitalism with a similar maxim. Overall this was a breath of fresh air to read.
---
embrace the dork side
Statement put out by man who crashed plane into IRS office in Austin, Texas
Authored by: Admin on Thursday, February 18 2010 @ 11:03 PM UTC
If you have to go out like this guy did, at least pick your targets wisely like this guy did.
Statement put out by man who crashed plane into IRS office in Austin, Texas
Authored by: FrankC on Thursday, February 18 2010 @ 11:40 PM UTC
killing random people is not cool. those people probably had families, kids, etc...
not cool.
not cool.
Statement put out by man who crashed plane into IRS office in Austin, Texas
Authored by: Luna on Friday, February 19 2010 @ 12:01 AM UTC
Innocent people are killed all the time. If they're working for a system that screws everybody over then they're not "innocent". I suppose innocence is based upon personal opinion. In my personal opinion I cheer this guy on. Not because I think he was in the right, but because he did something where as most of the people who feel this way do nothing but let themselves be crushed under the drudgery of trying to "survive" while others take what is meant to be theirs and squander it. It say something about a society when the people in it feel they have to do things like this. And he's not the only one. He may have gone out with a bang, but there are many more who die quietly. I consider him an innocent victim of circumstances that never should have happened.
Statement put out by man who crashed plane into IRS office in Austin, Texas
Authored by: beret on Friday, February 19 2010 @ 09:21 AM UTC
"Innocent people die all the time. If they're working for a system that screws everybody over then they're not "innocent"." Congratulations on the flippant quote of the week award, you callous fuck. Yeah, innocent people die all the time. Doesn't mean there's any need for applause when they do. And at what point do secretaries and people coming to file income statements begin "Working for a system that screws everybody over?" Is it okay to kill Wal-Mart greeters now?

Seriously, I'm not diggin this newfound breeziness with regard to collateral damage.
Statement put out by man who crashed plane into IRS office in Austin, Texas
Authored by: Admin on Thursday, February 18 2010 @ 11:28 PM UTC
2/18 was an inside job!

Had to be said...
Statement put out by man who crashed plane into IRS office in Austin, Texas
Authored by: BastaDeNaziones on Friday, February 19 2010 @ 01:39 AM UTC
Seriously though- this flies in the face of the idea of terrorism being an out-of-american, or unamerican experience. Fuck, everyone can relate to the invasive role of the IRS, even these Tea Party idiots. I wouldn't necessarily cheer this guy on, but I wouldn't condemn this act. Even if it's not a part of *anarchist* current events (debatable), this could be an important moment for anarchists to speak out and define a position. This is some confusing shit for the media, have you seen the pundits blubbering over themselves?
Statement put out by man who crashed plane into IRS office in Austin, Texas
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, February 19 2010 @ 02:59 AM UTC
My ignorant republican uncle once said:

"You know the way the Klan hates black people? That's the way a lot of folks feel about the IRS."

And he was right.
Statement put out by man who crashed plane into IRS office in Austin, Texas
Authored by: BastaDeNaziones on Friday, February 19 2010 @ 03:55 AM UTC
Uhhh... do you want to clarify what you mean by that? That could be taken a few different ways, not all of which are even close to cool.
Statement put out by man who crashed plane into IRS office in Austin, Texas
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, February 19 2010 @ 04:47 AM UTC
I'm sorry, I thought it was pretty clear.

"Some people, for whatever reason, really, really, passionately hate the IRS, in a way that could seem extremist to others who don't share their convictions" was what I believe my ignorant republican uncle was getting at.
Statement put out by man who crashed plane into IRS office in Austin, Texas
Authored by: Perica on Friday, February 19 2010 @ 01:07 AM UTC
Fuck this, vigilante acts of violence against bueurocrats and office workers is nihlistic terrorism. No manifesto no matter how well its written is going to justify this crap. I took me hours to get in touch with my family in Austin, and despite there being no reason to be at the IRS office, its still terrifying. This serves no tactical or political purpose that is going to create a free society.

If folks haven't read this, I encourage you to read "You cant blow up a social relationship" which makes a thorough case from an anarchist perspective against terrorism:
http://libcom.org/library/you-cant-bl...lationship
Statement put out by man who crashed plane into IRS office in Austin, Texas
Authored by: feraleffinedge on Friday, February 19 2010 @ 01:23 AM UTC
"..I know your family's grievin'...FUCK EM!" -Ice T
Statement put out by man who crashed plane into IRS office in Austin, Texas
Authored by: Comeon on Friday, February 19 2010 @ 05:52 PM UTC
No, you can't blow up a social relationships, but you sure as hell can blow up an IRS office.

But the article you linked to is idiotic anyways, of course you can blow up a social relationship! The idea that physical interactions have no connection to social interactions is ridiculous, oddly reminiscent of the mentality the Situationists warned of; separation perfected.


Hell, the very existence of the word "terrorism" proves you wrong, the fact you are whining about this event proves you wrong.
Statement put out by man who crashed plane into IRS office in Austin, Texas
Authored by: scott crow on Friday, February 19 2010 @ 03:19 AM UTC
To me this is one of those events where you have to be careful where we stand. Not because of the state or public perceptions, but because of the confused politics of desperation that is gaining a foothold on the 'right'. Are we reactionaries who would let some bureaucracy be worth something like this, or are do we want to make strategies actions that affect those who assume to have power so they don't?

He represents the insidiousness of the 'populist'/conspiracy theorist/patriot/right. It sounds sort of appealing, but once you are below the surface the real 'politics' air their ugly heads. Their politics are grounded in reactionary fear, and you cannot reason with that.

This 'lone wolf' expressed sentiments heard on everyone from Glenn Beck to Alex Jones and all the carnival barkers in between. Day after day they espouse 'end times' politics that its all over and we should just arm ourselves. Its a sick mantra. Tryanny, NWO, Black president, socialism! And that mantra is has resonance with legions of angry white formerly middle class, and mostly men have lately been tea bagging from coast to coast and calling it debate and dialog to take america back. From who they don't even know. They have bought the message hook, line and sinker. They have no power, they are losing their houses, their jobs and the government they believed in was corrupt, and indifferent. The stories in the politics of fear leave these people with only one way out. To fight.

And what do we see? We have seen an increase in militias AGAIN, and gun sales are through the roof. Been to a gun show lately? Sales are brisk.
We have also seen an increase in these isolated acts of violence against 'liberals', and the state from 'lone wolfs'. It works like the classic terrorism, even if there is no 'organized' plot from a group of people, the ideas have taken root and no has to be organized, they read what they want between the lines.

Most suicide bombers do it alone. This doesn't make it any less terroristic. They patriots want us all to wake up and revolt, and some are using violent tactics against a civilian population with more frequency. Those lone wolves who feel marginalized and scared that the 'socialist apocalypse' is here begin to see their actions in the context of a life and death struggle--whether it really is or not.

There are many under currents in a movement and the right wing tea baggers are a movement, then there are lots of spectrum's of action within it.
But we should be clear it is a gathering and breeding place for not just anti-government rhetoric, but action. And you cannot reason with the politics of fear.

If we talked about half the things they did, we would be in prison. Hell they want to put some of us in prison for protesting.
Let's be careful not to read into his words a similar sentiment, because even many modern neo-nazi's are also anti-government and we would never side with them would we? What I hope defines our politics is what we are for , not just what we are against. That is the seperation of us and the reactionary 'populist' right wing movements.

Thanks for listening
---
'dream the future
know your history
organize your people
fight to win'

scott crow
Statement put out by man who crashed plane into IRS office in Austin, Texas
Authored by: BastaDeNaziones on Friday, February 19 2010 @ 04:01 AM UTC
Scott, did you read the piece he wrote? Possibly you dug a little deeper into his other blogs, but as I was reading his piece my eyes kept darting to find the right-wing, patriot movement crap I was worried it would have. I actually didn't find any, and feel like this guy is pretty sincere about his anti-government attitude. Likewise, did you catch the little ditty at the end:

The communist creed: From each according to his ability, to each according to his need.

The capitalist creed: From each according to his gullibility, to each according to his greed.

This is one of the more hopeful things I've read in a while. At least the tea-partiers don't have a monopoly on desperate anti-government sentiment yet- Anarchists, we have ground to win!
Statement put out by man who crashed plane into IRS office in Austin, Texas
Authored by: scott crow on Friday, February 19 2010 @ 04:21 AM UTC
didn't read anything other than his manifesto either. But I put 2 and 2 together.
His writing was very tragic and personal, but it also had the earmarks of conservative viewpoints to me in two ways that are currents that run through the patriot movements.
One that he was powerless against the gov't.
Two that the IRS was the focus.
These are part of the patriot/militia mantras. (NEVER Corporation's)

The communist quotes are a red herring. People like Alex Jones and their ilk use all kinds of popular language to make their points, but it doesn't make their politics any better (and I promise I am not trying to split hairs here). One time (of many) I heard Alex going on about the war in Iraq and how we should bring our troops home etc.etc. I was thinking, he's an idiot but I can agree with that, then he says..."and go to war on Mexico to stop illegals from crossing the border' . My jaw dropped. But it illustrates how reactionary populist politics works. Common language, with an undertone that leads towards fear and fascism.

When 'we' have rants across our movements they are usually broader in analysis (even ones in simple form) and the IRS is not the target. In militia movements the IRS IS always a target.

And let's look at it. He wasn't some poor marginalized person, he had a half a million dollar house outside Austin (the city I live in) and owned and a plane. He wasn't exactly hurting financially compared to most in the u.s. and definitely to the rest of the world.
Even if he was just a nutter, I hold that he was influenced by right wing ideas , not by 'lefty' sentiment.
I own a gun , but i don't write and talk about stockpiling weapons to fight the government..

Apologies for the brevity.
---
'dream the future
know your history
organize your people
fight to win'

scott crow
Statement put out by man who crashed plane into IRS office in Austin, Texas
Authored by: HPWombat on Friday, February 19 2010 @ 10:14 AM UTC
The use of rudimentary political theory doesn't equate to the brand of populism that Alex Jones, the liberals, the conservatives, the nazis or whatever uses. He is someone that lost faith in the American ideal. Perhaps a former patriot, but he has clearly decided that patriotism is an untenable lie and being a proponent of the ethics of constitutional freedom has failed. Overall, I disagree with how you decided this person is a threat. Instead, this person is older and perhaps has had discussions with friends and family about politics. He writes cleaning with a good understanding of the English language, so is familiar with putting his ideas down, even if this went through several drafts before completion.

This person is not a part of any movement (in most ways) but does stand out as an actor in a social movement that is still suffering from postmodern despair. There have been other loners that have taken a similar stand, such as the fellow that yelled "shoot the mayor!" before trying to shoot the mayor. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/artic...spute.html

Both actors are older than the typical school shooter, spree killer or islamic terrorist. Their attacks are based around a context of getting fucked by the government, throwing their once middle class lives into turmoil. Late in life, they have decided that frustrations no longer could be tolerated and life couldn't start again after losing their battles to keep their lives together. This is not to say these fellows can be called anarchists or communists, but it would be confusing to call them populists or leftists just as well. They are exactly the same people that are pushed into desperate acts, they act not out of making their politics reality, but rather they act because they have been thoroughly fucked by the system. Rather than accept it or commit suicide in a conventional way, they decided to expose calamities with a vengeance and attack those they held responsible for their misery. I do not applaud their bad lives, I do not applaud the lack of a visible social movement to participate within, which often the disgruntled join and often become the biggest proponents of radical change through action. But I will not shit on this guy nor argue there is a safe place to condone collateral damage. People like this can be discussed, agents of change in this society come from many class and identity backgrounds.

This is part of the times we live in and this is a sign that things are indeed bad. But also it is a sign that people are connecting the dots without political intervention and are placing blame on the government and other institutions of power within society. This person exposed several problems, such as with health care and how they kill, cripple and rob people to turn a profit. The mockery of the FAA being a weak institution to attack the IRS for being a fucked institution was colorful and humorous. This is spit in the face of the system and a big middle finger gravestone for Stock. He acknowledges he is not an action of change...this manifesto is written in a layman's way dealing with the same post modern crisis that anarchists also face. If someone is really set on suicide, there are worse ways to go out.
--- embrace the dork side
Statement put out by man who crashed plane into IRS office in Austin, Texas
Authored by: Juniper11 on Friday, February 19 2010 @ 06:21 AM UTC

I'm not down with this. He didn't have a reasonable justification to take lives at the IRS building, this was random, it wasn't an act of self-defense, and it didn't even target anyone with a special complicity. Working people give the government thousands of dollars every year through taxes, money that goes to bomb and kill folks around the world. Seriously, the anarchists I know literally pay the government the money they depend on to continue perpetuating their existence. People work at horrible corporations engaged in all kinds of nefarious crap. University students do research that benefits the military. And on and on. The problem is systems, and dropping out entirely is not an option because it precludes the kind of resistance work necessary to change things. This act will not save lives, it will not change systems, it will simply lead to someone else being hired to take the killed persons place. I understand acts of anger. I can't say I wouldn't understand the perspective of an Iraqi who came over to the US and started opening fire at anyone who paid taxes, but understanding isn't always agreeing. This kind of stuff isn't effective and it isn't right. 

Statement put out by man who crashed plane into IRS office in Austin, Texas
Authored by: XavierToledo on Friday, February 19 2010 @ 06:29 AM UTC

It's odd to see even a few people drooling over this, supporting it, or even sympathizing with the actions of this man. Funny, how some of you will get excited over any action with a manifesto left in the name of that action, so long as it has any TINY hint of what you view as 'anti-capitalism'. This action was fucked up, sure those people "worked for the system", but that stand-point can not only be argued as morally wrong one, but it assumes that the individuals are the problem rather than the way these institutions and systems cause the individuals to act and exploit each other collectively; which clearly goes against any Anarchist leaning philosophy. We should encourage collective action against systems of domination, not individuals loosing their minds and harming unarmed civilians in violent attacks. The "manifesto" he left reeks of political confusion, and even border-line insanity. It may be an enjoyable read, but don't attempt to align the Anarchist movement with these acts or even these type of viewpoints. I doubt he was actually "anti-capitalist" as much as he was angry about him being penalized for evading taxes. He seemed wealthy, and like he was doing well, or at least better than the 90 percent of the population. Even if he did call himself 'anti-capitalist' it's foolish to assume that in itself is grounds to see him as someone we should align ourselves with or even display solidarity with. Stalinists call themselves anti-capitalists, as do many other vanguardist "revolutionaries" who stifle popular revolt, and often do commit individual attacks on people. It shows how desperate the North American Anarchist movement, or Anti-capitalist movement has become when they're ready to throw their support towards anyone who may have said something they agree with and made news based on the actions he or she took regardless of what those actions were (perhaps this is due to us not seeing the excitement we want to see within our movement, but fuck this stupid bullshit, lets make it happen). I see this as something that has nothing to do with movements that strive for social revolution, and at best it represents the insanity that a sick society can produce, which can also be said about perhaps, columbine. In other words, I think Anarchists should NOT support this act, and should continue to do productive organizing rather than support such bullshit.

Statement put out by man who crashed plane into IRS office in Austin, Texas
Authored by: Al Ligator on Friday, February 19 2010 @ 07:27 AM UTC
I think the true tragedy here is that people still don't find many venues available for themselves to feel that they can act WITH others and are continuously lashing out individually (even anarchists who carry out fun night-time activity may be doing so because we don't yet have the power to do that during the day, with others).

What we need is fucking power, agency, to be an 'ungovernable force' as they say.

Too many suicides, too many 'gone out with a bang' rebels.

What is controversial here isn't the act of slamming a plane into a building, despite how extreme that may be, the real point to discuss is how to become a TANGIBLE THREAT that is open (meaning: welcoming) to spreading across the social terrain.

The violence ain't the problem, it's that it ain't collectivized...
Statement put out by man who crashed plane into IRS office in Austin, Texas
Authored by: talonx on Friday, February 19 2010 @ 09:56 AM UTC
It's to bad he didn't even listen to himself, regarding his 'insanity' quote. Violence (the dictionary definition not the neoliberal one including property) does not lead to order. This man may have had some ideas, but he was too weak to actually confront those Ideas and do something about it. He took the easy way out. Shame on him. Anybody that looks up to this man should ask themselves, what did he accomplish that is lasting and was it worth it?

Statement put out by man who crashed plane into IRS office in Austin, Texas
Authored by: BB! News on Friday, February 19 2010 @ 03:37 PM UTC
For some of you who think that those working in the IRS building were "innocent" or "collateral damage" we would suggest you listen to Ward Churchill's speech, "ON THE JUSTICE OF ROOSTING CHICKENS." http://c-spanvideo.org/program/185494-1

Those workers were not innocent. They were Little Eichmans.

You cant advocate revolution and then call dead workers in the imperialist machine innocent.

Get over it.
Edited on Friday, February 19 2010 @ 03:37 PM UTC by BB! News
Statement put out by man who crashed plane into IRS office in Austin, Texas
Authored by: andyjay on Friday, February 19 2010 @ 05:02 PM UTC
Why is it almost every time I read something from people in Bash Back it sounds like they're growling and snarling? People with basically the same set of ideas and beliefs who slightly disagree are responded to with such hostility. People who use different tactics or constructively disagree on things like this aren't the enemy. You and whoever else acts like this need to get over yourselves and start communicating to other anarchists like you actually respect them.

Churchill has clarified himself later saying that he wasn't calling the janitors or menial workers in the trade center as little Eichmanns. Attacking an office building is basically ensuring that working people that have a minimal role in imperialism and capitalism (janitors, clerks) will be killed or seriously hurt.

And, saying that killing people who are part of the imperialist machine is justified would mean that EVERYONE in the United States should be killed. That's why I say "minimal role in imperialism." By paying taxes, being a consumer, having a job, taking out a mortgage, building credit, by any participation in the state-capitalist system we are contributing to its survival. Everyone is a "little Eichmann." We're all apart of the imperialist machine, there's NO WAY to remove yourself from that responsibility and guilt minus revolution.
Statement put out by man who crashed plane into IRS office in Austin, Texas
Authored by: Just Me on Friday, February 19 2010 @ 06:40 PM UTC
Yeah, I think that was a pretty stupid response by Bash Back News as well, and as a genderqueer tranny dyke I tend to admire a lot of what they do, but that is just stupid. I really hope the person making those comments doesn't speak for the group as a whole. I work at a low-income elementary school getting paid by the federal government--am I now a justifiable target? Not all of us are privileged enough or even have the desire to drop out of the machinery completely, which is probably not even possible anyway. Yes, IRS workers are clearly part of the imperialist machine, but that doesn't mean they are justifiable targets. This is why I am starting to become really disillusioned with the anarchist movement and the fetishism of militancy. Don't get me wrong--I think militant action has it's place, but killing low-level bureaucrats is unethical, irresponsible, and not very tactically savvy anyway. Fuck this "take no prisoners" mentality.

That being said, I sympathize with this guy and feel sorry he felt driven to such an act of desperation. I also think it's a good sign that the populist anti-IRS movement seems, at least based on this one individual, to be wising up a bit as far as analysis (more so than say the Teabaggers or militia movement, though he clearly had farther to go), but it doesn't excuse his actions. He was desperate and I understand where he was coming from, but he made a very poor choice both ethically and tactically. I really wish his anger could have been redirected into a more productive means of resistance, but alas that is not the case. Regardless, anyone who tries to say these people deserved it are probably either incredibly privileged and/or incredibly heartless. Either way, I wouldn't want to organize with them.
Statement put out by man who crashed plane into IRS office in Austin, Texas
Authored by: Just Me on Saturday, February 20 2010 @ 12:45 AM UTC
Actually, I should clarify what I say about hoping this comment doesn't speak for the whole group--I am aware that Bash Back is a decentralized network and therefore there is no "group" to speak for all of. What I should have said is I hope this isn't how the bulk of individuals involved in Bash Back feel. If so I might want to rethink trying to form a chapter in my area.
Statement put out by man who crashed plane into IRS office in Austin, Texas
Authored by: Pure_Funk on Friday, February 19 2010 @ 05:00 PM UTC
honestly I feel like the people who are supporting this guy really need to think about what happened. Morally, the action is not alright. And tactically, this type of action is terrible. I know this guy wasn't an anarchist, but as anarchists, we shouldn't breathe a word of support for shit like this. Crashing a plane into a building? Come on! Anything that even remotely resembles terrorism will never get public support and will produce a huge blowblack that will inevitably fall back on us. With authorities already trying to demonize us as terrorists, do people really need to be expressing support for this type of idiotic action? We need to look at the context. I feel the same way about this as I feel about armed struggle. It doesn't accomplish anything.
Statement put out by man who crashed plane into IRS office in Austin, Texas
Authored by: HPWombat on Friday, February 19 2010 @ 09:56 PM UTC
I'm breathing plenty of support. Also the general public are setting up plenty of fan pages in support of Joe Stack. You like to make up shit to fit your little world view of how powerful the deed can be. Only leftists want to suppress rebellion with their morally bankrupt ideas, like yours. Stop trying to control people with your safe place for rebellion bullshit.
---
embrace the dork side
Statement put out by man who crashed plane into IRS office in Austin, Texas
Authored by: Pure_Funk on Sunday, February 21 2010 @ 11:06 PM UTC
i'm not trying to control anyone. just stating some thoughts and a viewpoint like you...
Statement put out by man who crashed plane into IRS office in Austin, Texas
Authored by: XavierToledo on Friday, February 19 2010 @ 05:16 PM UTC
Once again you assume the individuals are the problem rather than the way these individuals are conditioned to interact and dominate one another by systems and institutions of authority. By that standard, Anarchism isn't a necessary way of thinking because it assumes A. We just need better individuals in power or B. Human nature is doomed to function within oppressive systems. You can't seriously expect to have a mass movement when you promote such insane and bullshit ideas that advocate vanguardist or individual approaches to "rebellion" and attacks on UNARMED workers. I think the American Anarchist movement needs to separate themselves from the bullshit "individualist lifestylist" approach to 'struggles', and begin creating grounds for collective action and rage. I'm happy to see it looks like this 'evolution' has already started.
Statement put out by man who crashed plane into IRS office in Austin, Texas
Authored by: scott crow on Friday, February 19 2010 @ 05:16 PM UTC
I actually want to clarify or retract my categorically broad stroking him as being 'right wing'. I spoke to quickly.
In my haste to post I actually forgot to think it through and write it out.

Actually the militia/patriot/anti-tax/anti gov't. and many within the tea bagger movement
consider themselves BEYOND traditional right/left politics. Which I think added to the confusing note
he left that is a mix of lefty and right mixed together. These guys (especially the conspiracy theory bent) among them
sees NWO ("new world order") big gov't. literally taking over their lives and they need to stop it. With guns? Terrorism? Voting? Hell I have no idea.
As I said before, in my assessment, their politics are confused because they are based on fear and are reactionary.
You cannot reason with that.

But in the minutia their politics which are often libertarian are about individual libertarianism (big 'L' and little 'l') where the individual is more important
thank anything. There are many flavors within this too (to many to go into). Painting it with a broad stroke again I would say their property and their life is more important than anything.
Whereas in anarchist leaning ideas we are social libertarians that generally hold our individual rights within collective responsibility. Our individual actions
matter in the context of how they affect larger communities.

Anyway some more quick thoughts.
---
'dream the future
know your history
organize your people
fight to win'

scott crow
Statement put out by man who crashed plane into IRS office in Austin, Texas
Authored by: HPWombat on Friday, February 19 2010 @ 09:51 PM UTC
I still find your conclusions to be speculative at best, fabrications at worst. This person experienced a problem, they didn't play politics. What he did was not an act of political terror, it was an act of Joe Stack, some dude. I know you want to say "populist". He does not represent anyone's aims or wishes other than himself. Populism is rarely pro-communist as well...in fact I'd like you to source any pro-communist populist. The direction of Joe Stack's manifesto goes against your analysis.
---
embrace the dork side
Statement put out by man who crashed plane into IRS office in Austin, Texas
Authored by: JBizzle on Saturday, February 20 2010 @ 05:41 PM UTC
He caused a ripple in the spectacle by causing damage to a tangible space and creating language not normally discussed in mainstream thought, such as the possibility of regaining INDIVIDUAL AUTONOMY. He actually <i>did</i> something.
We get <i>thousands</i> of anarchists at a summit or at the olympics and all we do is break some storefronts and toss some news boxes (one drunk fuck could do that in 10 minutes on any given night and walk away). Indescriminate bombing isn't revolution (his concept of a "body count" is exploitative at best), but it creates a vaccum for a new concept...like, <i>I</i> don't have to be a cadaver.
Arguing about the rationality of it is disregarding the irrationality of our non-action, of our inability to actually say something with this much intensity. Shit, look how submissive we are to the spectacle, not only in our working half-lives, but in our willingness to dismiss and degrade someone's act of desperation against the power of the state and capital.'
Statement put out by man who crashed plane into IRS office in Austin, Texas
Authored by: Al Ligator on Sunday, February 21 2010 @ 12:01 AM UTC
"Arguing about the rationality of it is disregarding the irrationality of our non-action, of our inability to actually say something with this much intensity. Shit, look how submissive we are to the spectacle, not only in our working half-lives, but in our willingness to dismiss and degrade someone's act of desperation against the power of the state and capital"

And it is this 'inability', and this 'willingness to dismiss' that will keep these acts isolated, and outside of our circles as we smother attempts at making a collective change.