"Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth."

Welcome to Infoshop News
Sunday, May 19 2013 @ 09:51 AM CDT

"Student Leaders" Sabotage UC Berkeley Occupation

News ArchiveLast night, a concerted effort by self-appointed "student leaders," mostly from CalServe, successfully prevented a student occupation of Wheeler Hall.

"Student Leaders" Sabotage UC Berkeley Occupation

by UC Berkeley Occupation Committee

Last night, a concerted effort by self-appointed "student leaders," mostly from CalServe, successfully prevented a student occupation of Wheeler Hall.

An occupation committee had prepared the logistics for the occupation of Wheeler Hall, and planned to bring a proposal to the so-called "general assembly" planned for 6pm. But moderators representing the official student leadership stepped in to impose a formal procedural structure that would prevent any and all political action following on the heels of the successful walkout.

Bullying from the moderator led to a vote in favor of breakout discussion groups, which divided and weakened the energy that had been brought to the room. The occupation committee managed to move the general assembly to Wheeler Auditorium, but the "leaders" insisted rigidly on a reportback from every single breakout group, hearing every single proposal for letter-writing campaigns, for contacting our elected representatives, etc. When members of breakout groups suggested an occupation, this was placed as a proposal among many to be subjected to an eventual, meaningless vote, long after the time for doing so had come and gone.

[Leave UCBOC Alone!]

At one point, a student managed to convince these "leaders" to allow the reading of the occupation statement issued by students at UC Santa Cruz. The crowd was visibly moved, and roared in support of the UCSC students, before chanting "Occupy! Occupy!" for several minutes. As the occupation committee sought an immediate vote, the self-imposed leadership insisted that the reportback procedure continue for a full hour more (yes, there was a vote, but both options led to the same continuation of procedure). The energy and momentum of the room was not respected, this was not democracy: it was proceduralism in an effort to prevent any strategy or tactic that the leadership disagreed with.

Members of the occupation committee began to secure the building with locks and chains (while leaving doors open for those who wished to leave), while continuing efforts to bring the proposal before the crowd, whose energy was now waning as a result of a thousand reportbacks.

This was when the real ugliness began. Ricardo Gomez of CalServe took the stage and began barking at the crowd, ironically seizing the bully pulpit to denounce the occupation effort as "undemocratic." What was undemocratic was the proceduralism of the leadership which refused to respect the will of the people present. Gomez knew what he was doing: he was consciously destroying the radical energy of the people gathered there. Rather than calling a vote on occupation, he pushed the gullible to tears by insinuating that they had been taken hostage when this was not the case.

This was a disgusting and despicable case of the worst form of opportunism, the effects of which are only beginning to be felt.
Share
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Ask
  • Kirtsy
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Twitter
  • SlashDot
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Fark
  • Del.icio.us
  • Blogmarks
  • Yahoo Buzz
"Student Leaders" Sabotage UC Berkeley Occupation | 4 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
"Student Leaders" Sabotage UC Berkeley Occupation
Authored by: blackhand on Saturday, September 26 2009 @ 04:39 PM CDT

Members of the occupation committee began to secure the building with locks and chains (while leaving doors open for those who wished to leave), while continuing efforts to bring the proposal before the crowd, whose energy was now waning as a result of a thousand reportbacks.

i don't really understand this reportback. first, it calls the assembly process undemocratic. then it says that a minority faction, under the guise of the peoples will, began implementing aspects of its proposal before there had been a vote, or maybe even discussion. how this faction understands the "will of the people present" better than others, we'd like to know.

i'm disappointed the the occupation failed, but the call for "democracy" by insurrectionaries is pretty transparent.

people may have been brought to tears, but an occupation is a scary idea. why not cry at the thought sometimes?

"Student Leaders" Sabotage UC Berkeley Occupation
Authored by: ForStudentPower on Saturday, September 26 2009 @ 07:26 PM CDT
At least there's still UC Santa Cruz:
www.occupyca.wordpress.com

And word is another attempt at a building occupation will be made on Berkeley's campus soon.
"Student Leaders" Sabotage UC Berkeley Occupation
Authored by: NotAZombie on Saturday, September 26 2009 @ 09:10 PM CDT
Leaders? Students? United States? What about the cross-cut sandwiches and puffy-paint t-shirts?
Cunts.
"Student Leaders" Sabotage UC Berkeley Occupation
Authored by: communitycntrl on Tuesday, October 06 2009 @ 02:30 AM CDT
i just read an article that i can now no longer find that mentions the UC Santacruz "ultraleftists" along with "liberals" as the 2 "obstacles" to "unity" in fighting to stop cuts or whatever....

just so you know, your socialist/communist "comrades" are ready to stab you in tha back for demanding more than just good universities in which to be molded into tools for corporate/state profits...big fucking surprise there, right?