Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth

Welcome to Infoshop News
Tuesday, February 09 2010 @ 05:28 PM UTC

4,000 Police Needed for G20 Meetings

Anarchist MovementIt will be the largest police presence on the streets of Pittsburgh in a generation. Police Chief Nate Harper is hoping to have more than 4,000 officers on hand to provide security for the G-20 summit in September. But Pittsburgh's own police force has just 877 officers

[Corporate News on G20]
As many as 4,000 police officers needed for G-20 summit

Civil rights groups concerned about size of presence

Sunday, June 28, 2009
By Jerome L. Sherman, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

It will be the largest police presence on the streets of Pittsburgh in a generation.

Police Chief Nate Harper is hoping to have more than 4,000 officers on hand to provide security for the G-20 summit in September. But Pittsburgh's own police force has just 877 officers, meaning planners will have to look to dozens of other law enforcement agencies to put "boots on the ground" Downtown, where leaders from the world's 20 largest economic powers will gather.

The summit, scheduled for Sept. 24 and 25 at the David L. Lawrence Convention Center, has attracted huge protests -- and clashes with police -- in other cities. About 10,000 officers were on duty for the London G-20 meeting in April.

The planning process in Pittsburgh is in its early stages. Last week, U.S. Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano named the summit a "National Special Security Event," making the Secret Service the lead agency for coordinating preparations.

Still, Pittsburgh's rank-and-file officers will be at the center of crowd-control efforts, which the city's top public safety officials will organize.

In an interview last week, Chief Harper said Pittsburgh would seek help from police departments throughout Pennsylvania and "all major cities" in the United States. Pittsburgh officials also intend to contact state police in West Virginia, Maryland and New York.

Police brass have canceled days off for city officers during the week of the summit, unless those days already had been approved. Officials are still determining how to staff the city's six police stations to make sure all 911 calls are answered. One possibility is making officers work 12-hour instead of eight-hour shifts.

Pennsylvania State Police will send 400 troopers to the city, although that figure could change, said Maj. Terry Seilhamer, of the Butler barracks, one of the top state police commanders in the western part of the state.

"Right now, everything is up in the air," he said.

State police also will provide at least one special emergency response team and several helicopters.

Troopers will undergo refresher training for "riot formation." They already are equipped with helmets and batons, and their crowd-control supplies, such as tear gas, are stored at individual barracks and in a warehouse in Harrisburg.

Maj. Seilhamer said state police have an "excellent relationship" with the command staff of the Pittsburgh police bureau.

Pittsburgh officials also must find a place for out-of-town officers to sleep. Chief Harper said a building with a cafeteria, such as a former school, would be ideal.

The city has not yet purchased mass quantities of non- and less-lethal weapons, like "bean bag rounds," for the G-20.

"We're not going to be very forthcoming about what we're getting," said Raymond DeMichiei, deputy director of the Office of Emergency Management and Homeland Security. "We're not going to telegraph what our capabilities are."

Lt. Col. Chris Cleaver, public affairs officer for the Pennsylvania National Guard, said there had not yet been any formal requests for troops. But the Guard is ready, he said.

"We continue to plan for possible missions for the G-20," he said. "What's great about the Guard is the sheer number of personnel -- boots on the ground."

More than 5,000 guardsmen are deployed, mostly in Iraq, but that leaves about 14,000 at home. Two large Guard units are located near Pittsburgh -- the 171st Air Refueling Wing, with 1,500 airmen, at Pittsburgh International Airport, and the 2nd Brigade Combat Team, with 2,348 soldiers, in Washington, Pa.

The 2nd Brigade was involved with security for the inauguration of President Barack Obama in January. Guard members were used on "presence patrols," such as checkpoints on roadways. The Guard also has special units that can respond to threats of weapons of mass destruction.

It's unclear whether Guard members would be able to make arrests. In other situations, such as security checkpoints at Pennsylvania's airports after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, Guardsmen would report suspicious activity to police.

Gov. Ed Rendell has broad powers over the deployment of the Guard, but his office declined to discuss specifics.

"We've been in conversations with the city about the meeting in general," said Chuck Ardo, Mr. Rendell's spokesman. "The governor is prepared to offer whatever assistance he can."

Warden Ramon Rustin, of the Allegheny County Jail, said his staff is working on a plan to deal with mass arrests. The jail now is nearly full, and a second holding site will be needed for the summit.

The specter of thousands of police officers and soldiers in Pittsburgh worries some free-speech advocates and members of groups that are planning to protest the economic policies of G-20 leaders.

"When you have reports of huge numbers of police coming in, it suggests they plan to cordon off much of Pittsburgh and prevent meaningful protest," said Jules Lobel, a law professor at the University of Pittsburgh. "Hopefully, that's not what they're planning."

Mr. Lobel also is vice president of the Center for Constitutional Rights, a New York group that was involved with lawsuits related to the 2004 Republican National Convention.

"There are certainly security concerns, but those concerns have to be balanced with First Amendment rights to protest," he said. "If there are law violators, the police ought to arrest them, but not arrest hundreds of other people."

Mr. Lobel will be working with Witold Walczak, legal director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Pennsylvania, and Michael Healey, a Pittsburgh lawyer with extensive experience in free speech cases, to make sure city officials don't try to keep protesters away from the Golden Triangle or follow the "kettling" practices of London police that involved keeping large groups of people confined in one area for hours.

"We will not be put in cages," said Carole Wiedmann, of the Thomas Merton Center's Anti-War Committee.

The center hosted a meeting yesterday at the First Unitarian Church of Pittsburgh in Shadyside to discuss preparations for the G-20 among members of the city's social justice community.

Earlier this month, a group of 60 "anarchists, radicals and anti-authoritarians" gathered to launch the Pittsburgh G-20 Resistance Project.

According to their Web site, resistG20.org, one goal is "to directly confront systems of oppression by advocating forms of resistance which maximize respect for life and oppressed peoples' rights, and construct local alternatives to global capitalism."

Preparations are also under way for "A People's Summit," on Sept. 21 and 22, with speeches and panel discussions related to the G-20. Paul Le Blanc, a professor of history at La Roche College, said organizers are still searching for a site.

Elizabeth Pittinger, executive director of the Citizen Police Review Board, said the board has been asking the police bureau for several years to put its crowd-control policies in writing.

Chief Harper said a written policy would be in place before the summit.

"For protesters, we have to make sure the message to them is, 'You're not the enemy,' " Ms. Pittinger said. "It's a wonderful opportunity for the city. But it's going to be a huge challenge to pull it off peacefully and safely."

Trackback

Trackback URL for this entry: http://news.infoshop.org/trackback.php?id=20090628000514755

Here's what others have to say about '4,000 Police Needed for G20 Meetings':

Daily Briefing — 27th-28th June 2009 « Little Alex in Wonderland
[...] Anarchism in Our Communities: Dialogue with Ashanti Alston 28 June 2009 (author unknown)4,000 Police Needed for G20 Meetings 28 June 2009 (author unknown)G8 set to push for a return to 'ethics' 28 June 2009 (author unknown)Sri [...] [read more]
Tracked on Sunday, June 28 2009 @ 07:19 PM UTC

4,000 Police Needed for G20 Meetings | 31 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
4,000 Police Needed for G20 Meetings
Authored by: communitycntrl on Sunday, June 28 2009 @ 09:59 PM UTC
this protest is going to be awesome. get ready everyone!
4,000 Police Needed for G20 Meetings
Authored by: DropScience on Sunday, June 28 2009 @ 10:03 PM UTC
how is it going to be awesome?

4,000 police vs probably 120 down anarchists.

the odds look shoddy at best.

im sick of this "its a chance for us to test our infrastructure" dribble.

treating this like a game is fucking stupid, and despite what everyone else has said i still think that supposedly understanding the critique and waste of time that summit hopping activism is people still are going to engage in it.

4,000 Police Needed for G20 Meetings
Authored by: redsdisease on Sunday, June 28 2009 @ 10:07 PM UTC
"despite what everyone else has said i still think that supposedly understanding the critique and waste of time that summit hopping activism is people still are going to engage in it."

What?
4,000 Police Needed for G20 Meetings
Authored by: DropScience on Sunday, June 28 2009 @ 10:09 PM UTC
people are saying they understand the inherent ridiculousness of summit hopping, but are still going to engage in it as soon as another conference rears its head.

i meant to say that its dumb, and just reiterate that.

4,000 Police Needed for G20 Meetings
Authored by: Admin on Sunday, June 28 2009 @ 10:24 PM UTC
Anybody who thinks that summit-hopping activism is ridiculous is pretty damn clueless.

If you think that summit-hopping is ridiculous, then you are basically saying that the global movement against capitalism is ridiculous. No matter which flavor of anarchism (or leftism) that you favor, the anti-summit protests were an effective, inspiring manifestation of our politics. Those protests were the best example of practice that our movements have ever accomplished. And let's remember that these movements were effective at a time when the economy wasn't in a global depression.

I'd really like to hear what people have accomplished as an alternative to summit-hopping. I'm not one of those who carelessly throws away one of the real accomplishments of our movements in recent decades.

Chuck
4,000 Police Needed for G20 Meetings
Authored by: DropScience on Sunday, June 28 2009 @ 10:35 PM UTC
i'd be really interested to hear what you mean by best examples of practice. a bunch of people getting arrested and then using tons of resources to get them out?

there doesnt need to be an alternative to summit hopping because its not needed.

what is the strategy? confront power and show them a better world?

yea it sucks, g8 in pittsburgh, boo hoo. but really, there 10,000 more pressing problems in the neighborhoods we inhabit. sure you can do both, and im not gonna get mad at individuals who take 3 days out of their lives to go. im just talking about the resources that go into all of the planning and infrastructure. the infrastructure exists for 3 days and disappears. where the longevity? i mean fuck, half these htichiking smelly anarcho hippies are transient enough, does our resistance have to just hop to whatever city is facing a summit?

its like a fucking traveling circus.
4,000 Police Needed for G20 Meetings
Authored by: JBizzle on Sunday, June 28 2009 @ 10:42 PM UTC
seriously, present an alternative and I'll take you seriously. It seems you're relegating yourself to attacks against subcultures you don't like. not that I'm super into punk travelers, but seriously, what the fuck? Do you even believe in solidarity or camaraderie, or is no one safe from your wrath?

also, I'm pretty sure there's been alot of discussion about avoiding the temporary organizing infrastructure, and making more permanent groups/projects/spaces.

I just want to reiterate my last point: what the fuck are you doing? what's your alternative to "summit-hopping". We don't need an alternative? WHAT THE FUCK?
I think it's pretty safe to say, the benefits of public and militant protest against a system that exploits and destroys is more beneficial then sitting around and listing the "10,000" problems we face in our neighborhoods (which I think many anarchists are doing).
4,000 Police Needed for G20 Meetings
Authored by: DropScience on Sunday, June 28 2009 @ 10:46 PM UTC
well in order to talk about an alternative lets talk about what summit hoping DOES, so we can see what the alternative needs to be FOR.

what does it accomplish, what are the cost vs benefits of them, and can we attain the same result (if its a desired result) in a different way with less risk to ourselves so that we effectively use other resources to communize amongst the people we live around.

4,000 Police Needed for G20 Meetings
Authored by: communitycntrl on Sunday, June 28 2009 @ 11:20 PM UTC
it inspires people who are radical to fight on for years of tedious local organizing and fighting because it shows an example of a large, momentum-filled, working vision of the future we want to inhabit and the possibilities for getting there.

so....
everyone make sure you bring people who haven't been to a big protest before, because everyone you bring will then become more engaged and involved in local activities after their inspiring experience.
that's the whole point in my opinion.
other than just the fact that its a fun time.
4,000 Police Needed for G20 Meetings
Authored by: Admin on Sunday, June 28 2009 @ 11:31 PM UTC
Exactly! Among many things, the N30/Seattle protests and the summit protests that followed were inspiring to many people. At that point, I was really burned out as an activist. If Seattle hadn't happened, I probably wouldn't have been involved in the anarchist movement, or, community organizing over the past ten years.

One of the conclusions I've reached in recent years is that radical politics are irrelevant to the mass of working people unless there are tangible results being achieved by radicals. I think that many anarchists don't understand the centrality of winning campaigns and reaching results that can be pointed to as working, tangible examples of the efficacy of our politics. I think this is why the anarchist movement in the U.S. has been pretty much invisible in the past 5+ years. If your focus is on building organizations, crafting the perfect flyer, or running around in isolated black blocs, you aren't really doing what needs to be done to achieve the results like the anti-globalization movement did. That's what the U.S. anarchist movement was doing in the 1980s and 90s. It didn't work, for the most part, although some of it did tie into the critical mass that built the post-Seattle movement.

Chuck
4,000 Police Needed for G20 Meetings
Authored by: communitycntrl on Monday, June 29 2009 @ 03:36 AM UTC
my armchair analysis of the anti-globalization/WTO critical mass is that in the 8 years of Clinton's presidency, grassroots individual movement against Clintonian policies were building up because when there is a Democrat president there can't be the distraction of trying to "get a democrat elected" like there can when the president is republican, and people see the only option as organizing to pressure the government to change.
all of those people trying to pressure Clinton to change his policies found each other at the WTO, because Clinton's economic policies were the most egregious part of his regime.

that's why democrats are better for anarchists, because they leave people with no option but organizing and pressure/demand the government to be less fucked up. they take away the "voting for someone better" option.
4,000 Police Needed for G20 Meetings
Authored by: Admin on Sunday, June 28 2009 @ 10:48 PM UTC
The methods of the anti-globalization movement are well documented in books, articles, films and more. As I see it, the hostility towards summit-hopping is mostly a knee jerk attitude. There have been some good critiques of summit-hopping, many of which can be found on this site, but it's pretty silly to dismiss summit-hopping.

You argue that neighborhood and community issues are more important, but this argument ignores the fact that the summit-hopping is a response to the concerns of communities around the world and it was an outgrowth of thousands of struggles on the local level.

I'm not arguing that summit-hopping should be the main priority of the anarchist/anti-capitalist movements. There are lots of alternative and comparable strategies, but what are these strategies? Are people up to doing the hard work involved in making them happen, or are they going to opt for easy tactics like the black bloc? The anti-capitalist summit protests relied on campaigns that had been going on for years. Anarchists were involved in many of these campaigns.

Chuck
4,000 Police Needed for G20 Meetings
Authored by: DropScience on Sunday, June 28 2009 @ 10:53 PM UTC
i dont think it is silly to dismiss it when its trying to create a dialogue with power. what should be worked on is creating autonomy. as i said this does not mean that individuals who choose to take 3 days to go to this are "bad", but it does mean we should analyze our decisions to see if making a mobilization against this and that issue is worth the resources and safety of those involved. it is of course up to individuals to make final decisions about what they want to do, but what i am saying is that i WISH as much enthusiasm went into working in peoples own neighborhoods as it does into summit "infrastructure".

its annoying to repeatedly see posts for summits and conferences and camps , but never for anything with much substance behind it. rarely with any staying power.
4,000 Police Needed for G20 Meetings
Authored by: Admin on Sunday, June 28 2009 @ 11:11 PM UTC
I think you really fail to understand the way that summit protests come out of community activism and help grow community activism. The dynamic is an important to understand, but it doesn't lend itself to spectacular coverage by any form of media. The process underlying the anti-summit strategy was always eclipsed by the spectacular actions and protests that happened during the summits.

There have always been many involved in the summit-hopping strategy that shared your concern about local struggles. Many of us consciously tried to link these struggles to what we were doing at the summit protests.

For example, I was part of the Anti-Capitalist Convergence in Washington, DC which was organizing a massive summit protest against the World Bank and IMF in September 2001, which was of course disrupted by the events of 9-11. But during the organizing of that campaign, we consciously were incorporating activism on local struggles into the anti-summit campaign. We were involved in a local affordable housing campaign. We also were involved in a campaign to save the city's only public hospital.

Chuck
4,000 Police Needed for G20 Meetings
Authored by: DropScience on Monday, June 29 2009 @ 11:01 PM UTC
i dont think im failing to understand it. i think that it is far and few between that these types of mobilizations, especially from anarchists, lead to any longevity in the area that hese summits happen.

im not saying " oh know theres gonna be cops, dont go!". kids are getting popped by cops left and right, tons of problems exist on our very local level, but it seems people dont do shit unless its some fucking summit of the richest countries blah blah bullshit.

its this continual attempt to "confront power" without taking into consideration that these power structures exist all around us. its a disregard of the totality of the situation.

trust me, im not trying to come off as another IA hack. we do do real shit in our neighborhood and connect with the people around us, much better than other places ive been involved with.

i just need to pose the question again. WHY go to summits, why are these the mass mobilizations? I am being asked to put forward an alternative, when there doesnt need to be one.

WHAT- do summits provide, that is so valuable, that we would need to supplement it?

4,000 Police Needed for G20 Meetings
Authored by: CaseyFord on Monday, June 29 2009 @ 11:13 PM UTC
These motherfuckers are preparing to invade my city, making most the everyday problems we have to deal with that much worse and bringing down extra repression on us anarchists (and that would happen from this summit even if anarchists in Pittsburgh released a statement that said "fuck anti-summit organizing, let them have their little meeting"). Why shouldn't we fight it, fighting local problems as we do it? And why shouldn't our comrades come to help us fight it?
4,000 Police Needed for G20 Meetings
Authored by: f xx f y on Tuesday, June 30 2009 @ 05:58 PM UTC
i really appreciate your critical view of events like this. i always think back to the last countersummit i attended, where some fantastic examples of quotes from the 'blac bloc' march included:

'this is what anarchy looks like!'
and
'anarchy, fuck yeah!'

thinking all along, if this is what anarchy looks like then count me the fuck out!

i definitely think there are ways in which to engage these meetings and summits without it being a massive demonstration of self-defeat. for sure, i have been impressed by the ability of people to scrape together the multiple thousands of dollars to get people out of jail, but what the hell good does that do repeating the situation over and over again if all you're getting is bruises and war stories? imagine if one was just as capable at scraping together all of that money for, say, tools, medical supplies, construction equipment, farm equipment?

i'm not of the mindset that response to these situations is completely useless. but i think that a sturdier analysis of the situation is necessary, especially considering that anarchists continue to invoke the memory of the WTO in seattle as an excuse for continuing to organize using pretty much the same model repeated constantly. that happened quite a few years ago, and since then the state and allied cronies have learned a whole lot from that (and all subsequent counter-summits) regarding how to more effectively disperse crowds, really fuck people up without killing them, throw the book at frequently arbitrarily-selected scapegoats, and use the media to completely blackball any actions that protesters take.

keep in mind: regardless of how you as a protester might frame the situation, the state and those with the guns ARE thinking of this militarily.
4,000 Police Needed for G20 Meetings
Authored by: DropScience on Tuesday, June 30 2009 @ 06:28 PM UTC
i completely agree. im sick of this "summits are fun" mentality. they arent fun. last summer i had to get a phone call telling me all of my friends, who have been my friends growing up, were no on the this was with the knowledge that iw as also about to be in a situation for this to happen. we had to sleep being scared of passing cars because at any minute it couldve meant a raid, and any false move in that raid could get a fucking bullet in your head.

you think this is fun?

fuck that.

i dont want to see more of my friends end up on some solidarity poster, asking for donations for legal fees, as they face years in prison and all the fucking subculture does is remember them as the <insert name> <insert number> people.

4,000 Police Needed for G20 Meetings
Authored by: DropScience on Tuesday, June 30 2009 @ 06:29 PM UTC
that was supposed to say *were on the ground face down with automatic weapons against their heads, wit hthe complete knowledge that i would be entering myself into similar situations.
4,000 Police Needed for G20 Meetings
Authored by: JBizzle on Sunday, June 28 2009 @ 10:36 PM UTC
I always mistook you for being against summit protests.
4,000 Police Needed for G20 Meetings
Authored by: arkyface on Tuesday, June 30 2009 @ 11:46 AM UTC
"If you think that summit-hopping is ridiculous, then you are basically saying that the global movement against capitalism is ridiculous."

I agree. the global "political" movement against capital is such a joke.
and we should spend months talking about how we are gonna sitck it to em in pittsburgh and then get crushed. yippee.
4,000 Police Needed for G20 Meetings
Authored by: JBizzle on Sunday, June 28 2009 @ 10:13 PM UTC
it's not a game?! oh nooo

but, also, don't come if you don't want to. OH WOW it's that simple.
you ole' timers [or those who like the emulate the temper tantrums of ole' timers] who no sooo much better, can sit around and post comments on infoshop.org. after all, that's changing EVERYTHING.

mostly, tho, it's a waste of time engaging these "critiques" [which basically boil down to "new anarchists are, lyke, totally dumb, and we were here first, and we're so much more anarchic with our FNB and vegan potlucks"]. The only thing I have to say for these wanna be cointelpro-bowlers is STFU. I just don't really care.
I will go to Pittsburgh. I will also get involved in my local organizing. If you don't like what I'm doing, do something yourself or don't bother making ad hominem attacks against my ideas of insurrection, because I don't give a fuck. I have yet to see any relevant alternatives in these critiques, beyond a return to an activist milieu with activist cliques. Whatever.
I don't care. Come, or don't come.
4,000 Police Needed for G20 Meetings
Authored by: veranasi on Sunday, June 28 2009 @ 10:16 PM UTC
No offense, most of IA folks are the old-timers. I don't know very many old timers who are 100 percent against IA. I know a great deal of new timers who either are against or completely misunderstand the concept.
4,000 Police Needed for G20 Meetings
Authored by: JBizzle on Sunday, June 28 2009 @ 10:34 PM UTC
IA?
4,000 Police Needed for G20 Meetings
Authored by: DropScience on Sunday, June 28 2009 @ 10:20 PM UTC
what the fuck are you talking about?

especially talking about the return to cliqueish activist milieus, and then defending summit protests, which is like activist disneyland.

yea i know i dont have to go, which is why im not. i mean yea keep the whole existentialist "this is my resistance" stuff, but be real about the effectiveness of your resistance. its not cointelpro to say that summit protests dont do dick, or that the supposed benefits of "showing them we can organize housing" dont outweigh the benefits of us staying where we are and working on shit on that level.

im mean seriously, youre gonna call that cointelpro?

because i dishevelled your comfy net?

gimme a break

4,000 Police Needed for G20 Meetings
Authored by: JBizzle on Sunday, June 28 2009 @ 10:32 PM UTC
no, because you go beyond critique of "summit-hopping" to straight up asshole comments...like everyone who has been complaining about anyone showing any excitement for the g-20 protests (or any protest for that matter).

and, yes, there is a considerable riot fetish in "activist" milieus, but I don't really know what's more dangerous...doing absolute shit, sitting around and complaining about people organizing public dissent, or the "strategic" ineffectiveness of that dissent.

seriously, you'll probably end up finding all of anarchism "pointless" in a couple years and in need of finding a "practical [strategic?]" life. You're milieu is SO FUCKING PREDICTABLE.
4,000 Police Needed for G20 Meetings
Authored by: laozi on Monday, June 29 2009 @ 09:49 AM UTC
so are you saying summits are the best opportunity genuine north american IA types have to feed off the momentum of "activist riot fetishism" and make total riot?

cause like other posters said here i think there are far many more IA types in the retired old guard (what people over 30?) than in the newb zone. i would actually argue though that a lot in the newbzone are way more attracted than ever to IA, and that really folks in their mid to late 20s currently are the activism diehards, because they did most of their coming of age under 8 years of Bush era anti-war derailment. of course these are all gross generalizations. a lot of times folks that are into IA have no choice but to do activist type things because it is the only option available to them locally.

i don't know, just my 2c
4,000 Police Needed for G20 Meetings
Authored by: laozi on Monday, June 29 2009 @ 10:07 AM UTC
also obviously IA is not all about make total destroy.

from what i've been able to gather from posting here in the past DropScience is pretty down with insurrection but would rather work in their own community and do autonomous insurrectionary projects there.

examples that they didn't give of other things other than summit hopping are things like starting up a radical grocery distribution with your crew instead of FNB as an act of real mutual aid and communism between friends instead of activist charity and guilt. Or squat a house with your crew instead of starting a rent co-op.

check out crudo's vegeance #2 for more ideas: http://www.mediafire.com/download.php?hhgyokjmmzf
or their blog: http://wewillhaveourvengeance.blogspot.com/

also 20 Theses On The Subversion Of The Metropolis is pretty good:
http://zinelibrary.info/20-theses-sub...metropolis
4,000 Police Needed for G20 Meetings
Authored by: kevin on Monday, June 29 2009 @ 09:16 AM UTC
The Guardian just had this article about untrained cops

MPs condemn police tactics at G20 protest:
Keep untrained officers off frontline at demos, says highly critical Commons committee report

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/...ing-report
4,000 Police Needed for G20 Meetings
Authored by: femin(A)zi on Monday, June 29 2009 @ 03:53 PM UTC
OMFG! there are going to be COPS at the G20 meeting in pittsburgh!?

stay at home! lock up your dogs and/or children! don't do anything because there will be cops trying to prevent you from doing it!

::yawn::

the black bloc is the safest place to be chickadees-- wear a hat, mind the surveillance cameras, and watch the glass (it can cut).
4,000 Police Needed for G20 Meetings
Authored by: nostalgia on Wednesday, July 01 2009 @ 12:23 AM UTC
For some of us, our critiques of summit actions are based on our own
experiences with the tendency. The time, energy, and money we've spent
over the years. The friends currently in jail, the friends going to jail,
and the friends with felony cases pending. The increased state
surveillance, the federal infiltration of groups organizing against these
summits, the informants who have come into our homes to discuss these
events.

It's hard to imagine a conflict at the g20 in Pittsburgh that does not
further reinforce a division between "activist" and "average person", a
struggle that does not further entrench the concept of a small subculture
being the ineffective specialist in social change. This problematic
division prevents conflict from generalizing. To the viewer, it appears
as a spectacular and almost staged conflict between two sides of
specialists.

I remember when we'd go to these things because we truly felt that we
could shut them down. And we didn't. Now, we say that we can't shut them
down, but we still go. Why? To try in vain? Often, friends have told me
they attend summits to to show "them" that, in the context of months of
increased surveillance and infiltration, with thousands of police on the
street, with hundreds of arrests, that a few windows will still get
broken.

Why is that a lesson we'd want to show anyone? Why not show that we can
attack on our own terms, that we aren't going to be fooled into fighting
on ground that isn't favorable to us?

In these conditions, it is hard to imagine a conflict that expands to
become truly uncontrollable. At these times, even the existence of a few
broken windows is contained, like a protest pen expanding to incorporate a
couple of Starbucks.

World leaders are the cause of exploitation every day of our lives. This
exploitation was not particularly profound during the 3 days that they met
in London, nor the days when they will meet in Italy, nor when they will
converge on Pittsburgh this September. By confining so much of our rage
to these specific instances, we create a situation where it appears that
these summits are of particular interest, that there is somehow something
different going on on those 3 days then the other 362 days of the year.

We are not the creators of social struggle. Conflict is a constant
presence between people and the system. This tension is often difficult
for the activist to perceive, but occasionally it erupts and rises to the
surface. To encourage and expand these conflicts, the tensions between
poor kids and the police, middle schoolers and principals, tenants and
landlords, conflicts that are understandable to most people, is to build a
new potential.