Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth

Welcome to Infoshop News
Tuesday, February 09 2010 @ 06:54 PM UTC

Police Terrorists Trained to Hate Protesters and Anarchists

Anarchist Opinion

Did you know that anarchists killed several police officers during the 1999 anti-WTO protests in Seattle?

No, you don't know that, because it never happened. But this is the kind of thing that many rank-and-file police believe who have been trained to police summit protests, including the ongoing anti-RNC protests happening this week in St. Paul, Minnesota. There were riots and lots of police violence in Seattle in 1999, but nobody was killed during those protests. Yet, police officers doing anti-protest policing in many American cities have been told this lie about anarchists.

Police Terrorists Trained to Hate Protesters and Anarchists

Infoshop News editorial
September 2, 2008

Did you know that anarchists killed several police officers during the 1999 anti-WTO protests in Seattle?

No, you don't know that, because it never happened. But this is the kind of thing that many rank-and-file police believe who have been trained to police summit protests, including the ongoing anti-RNC protests happening this week in St. Paul, Minnesota. There were riots and lots of police violence in Seattle in 1999, but nobody was killed during those protests. Yet, police officers doing anti-protest policing in many American cities have been told this lie about anarchists.

This is probably not the only lie about protesters and anarchists that are indoctrinated into the police. Those who attend protests and those who have been arrested can attest to hearing incredible anti-protester beliefs coming out of the mouths of the police. Numerous online message boards have seen comments about protesters that come from police officers.

Police doing protest duty at summit protests usually get anti-protester training in the months and weeks before the event. They go through briefings about protesters, so we have to assume that these anti-protester myths and stereotypes are a constant part of police training. And with the heavy involvement of the FBI, Secret Service and Homeland Security in the policing of summit and convention protests, we also have to assume that protesters are being labeled as “terrorists.”

It's widely known that militaries throughout history have had to use different kinds of techniques to get soldiers to kill people. Most humans are against themselves being involved personally in killing or hurting people. New soldiers have to go through training that breaks down their moral qualms about killing. These techniques usually involve dehumanizing an enemy. Soldiers are indoctrinated, and also terrorized, into killing what is supposed to be a faceless enemy. Yet, despite all of this training, wars always include soldiers who refuse to kill people.

The same process is at work in American police departments (and most police departments around the world). Police are trained in various techniques to bully, harass, intimidate and be violent against people. If you are poor and brown-skinned in the United States, you bear the brunt of this police violence on a daily basis. The police brutality that we've seen in Denver and St. Paul this week is the result of ongoing indoctrination of the police against protesters, especially any protesters of the left-wing stripe. Local police departments have been militarized to deal with protesters, with much of this militarization happening during the Clinton administration. After 9/11, local police were further turned into anti-terrorist organizations, with the effect that they see their work as fighting terrorists. Local police are also bringing home the terror tactics that the U.S. has been using in dozens of countries around the world for the past century.

The war on terror has escalated into an increased war on the “rabble” of America, most significantly protesters and anarchists. This doesn't surprise us, because the U.S. government has always been at war with dissidents of many kinds.

We do not have any hope that the police will change their attitudes or their ways. The purpose of the police is to act as the violent arm of capital and the state. The only way for the people to stop the police is to stand up to them, abolish the police and build a different society which has no police.

Trackback

Trackback URL for this entry: http://news.infoshop.org/trackback.php?id=2008inews-oped-rnc-police

Here's what others have to say about 'Police Terrorists Trained to Hate Protesters and Anarchists':

Police Terrorists Trained to Hate Protesters and Anarchists « Zenvironments
Tracked on Wednesday, September 03 2008 @ 09:53 AM UTC

Police Terrorists Trained to Hate Protesters and Anarchists | 9 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
Police Terrorists Trained to Hate Protesters and Anarchists
Authored by: communitycntrl on Wednesday, September 03 2008 @ 11:07 AM UTC
I know this is an opinion piece, but I'd sure like to see some citations or documentation to show that these most likely correct claims are indeed true.
Police Terrorists Trained to Hate Protesters and Anarchists
Authored by: Admin on Wednesday, September 03 2008 @ 01:20 PM UTC
It's hard to get citations on most of this stuff because much of it is part of the informal culture of policing. I've heard from several reliable anarchist sources on the information mentioned in this editorial. I myself have witnessed similar anti-anarchist and anti-protester words and behavior from the police. One example that I've seen with my own eyes are police motorcycles festooned
with patches ripped off of protester clothes. I can also report that the police squads who are involved in anti-protest policing get together for group photos after the protests. In some ways, the police have their own "convergence" atmosphere surrounding protests.

The comment below this one points to some citations about what the government says about protesters. We know that officially they say many prejudicial things about protesters, but sometimes you have to tell the ordinary police thug something more sensational, like the nonsense about Seattle.

Chuck
Police Terrorists Trained to Hate Protesters and Anarchists
Authored by: pablito on Wednesday, September 03 2008 @ 11:24 AM UTC
Hey Editor, I am also very interested in this topic and planned to write about it someday.

One of the very suspicious things which has happened and been exposed in after-action investigations in both Miami and DC, is the wildly inflated of "evil protesters coming to our city" numbers which authorities tell the public, versus numbers in their in-house intelligence.

Here's a quote from a federal law enforcement intelligence report circa 2002 which supports the "Seattle Myth" type of story. This is fairly good propaganda:

"ESCALATING VIOLENCE

"During the most recent protests, violence directed at law enforcement has increased dramatically. During teh 1999 Seattle protest, 56 injuries to law enforcement were reported. In September 2000, during the IMF meeting in Prague, 123 injuries of law enforcement personel occurred. In addition, the protesters used molotov cocktails and firebombs to assault police. During the APril 2001 Summit in QUebec, 101 law enforcement were injured, 3 requiring hospitalization. At the G-8 Summit in Genoa, Italy in July 2001, approximately 200 molotov coctails were thrown, over 420 injuries were reported and one protester was killed by police after the policeman was surrounded and assaulted while in a vehicle.

While there are no particularly nasty falsehoods in that paragraph, it is still terribly misleading. It is easy to ocnclude that the injuries in Seattle were due to protesters attacking police, whereas a press investigation showed the injuries were just routine police work injuries, and that is probably true for all the US demonstrations. It is also easy to conclude that police can expect molotov cocktails from protesters in the US, because the summary does not elucidate the vastly different protest cultures in each location.

It's difficult for me to believe that misleading propaganda this relentless is an accident.

To communitycntrl - sorry I haven't time to provide better citations right now. General sources are the DC Corporation Council Report and the Miami Civilian Investigative Panel report, and for general Seattle myth busting, the RAND corporation book chapter 7 (on line in PDF form) entitled "Netwar in the Emerald City"

Police Terrorists Trained to Hate Protesters and Anarchists
Authored by: pablito on Wednesday, September 03 2008 @ 07:53 PM UTC
At the Committee's December 18, 2003, public hearing Chief Ramsey was asked about the discrepancy between his public announcement that from 20 to 30,000 protesters were expected in the city and the department's own internal estimates that no more than 4,000 persons were expected at any individual event. He responded that MPD makes the most accurate crowd projections it can for upcoming demonstrations, and refused to acknowledge that the information the Department distributed internally differed from the information it shared with the public.

There can be serious consequences to releasing inaccurate information about the potential for civil disturbances during demonstrations. First, it is a violation of the public trust to release misleading information to the public. Second, there is a risk that law enforcement may over-react as a result of "over-preparing" for a crowd that is portrayed to be larger and more threatening than it is in reality. The massive over-reaction by the police during the international trade talks in Miami is an example of this phenomenon.

From City Council, Committee on the Judiciary Report on Investigation of the Metropolitan Police Department's Policy and Practice in Handling Demonstrations in the District of Columbia March 11, 2004. Search generally for 'estimate' in this document for a bit more.

RAND Book, see Chapter 7 - debunks several persistent Seattle myths. RAND is a longtime pro-government contractor.

Punishing Protest, a book by the National Lawyer's Guild, has a bunch of related documentation too.

Police Terrorists Trained to Hate Protesters and Anarchists
Authored by: engine summer on Thursday, September 04 2008 @ 08:30 PM UTC
i feel like im beating the same drum again: http://news.infoshop.org/article.php?story=20080904164754120 and elsewhere...

the point about militarization of police is a good one. but again, what about when people actually do hurt police? this essy sadly reminds me of the usual pacifist crying about "dont hurt us, we are just exercising our rights, we arent a threat to anyone!"
Police Terrorists Trained to Hate Protesters and Anarchists
Authored by: Admin on Thursday, September 04 2008 @ 09:38 PM UTC
Absolutely not! There is nothing in this essay which reflects anybody crying about police brutality, including pacifists.

This essay is about how the police operate. This is something that anarchists should always be talking about. We need to speak up about police terrorism. Please don't assume that the entire readership of Infoshop News is made up of anarchists. Yes, most of us know that the police are terrorists, but your comments suggest that we shouldn't speak up in anger about police actions. What would you have us do, shut up and be smug that we know the cops are evil?

We reject the anarchist mentality that anarchists shouldn't talk to the outside world. Infoshop News is not about publishing smug anarchist opinions that are meant just for anarchists to read.
Police Terrorists Trained to Hate Protesters and Anarchists
Authored by: engine summer on Friday, September 05 2008 @ 02:32 AM UTC
i dont believe i said anything about who "we" should or shouldnt be addressing - the question i dealt with was how, rather, to approach the issue. so to be clear, this is an epistle to liberal protestors?
Police Terrorists Trained to Hate Protesters and Anarchists
Authored by: Wargasm on Friday, September 05 2008 @ 03:41 AM UTC
I don't think this is really an epistle to liberal protesters, rather it seems like a brief analysis of the situation at hand. It is also rather important that this was posted now, for obvious reasons. Right now, as I'm sure you and others know, the corporate media is having a bit of an onslaught against protesters, and anarchists in particular. This Reuters title - Plans for kidnapping, bombs at convention: documents - really shows how that the analysis in the essay above is very important right now. It's not that it was posted for liberals, but rather as a counter to the extremely crude propaganda that is circulating.
Police Terrorists Trained to Hate Protesters and Anarchists
Authored by: lawrence on Friday, September 05 2008 @ 10:40 AM UTC
The petulant turnabout of terms -- calling the cops "terrorists" -- is just an attempt at emotionally satisfying rhetoric. Yeah, the cops do things that make us sad, but the term "terrorist" has a history, and if that context is ignored, then the term becomes completely meaningless. This, of course, is exactly how the cops and bureaucrats use the word, and quite deliberately. Let them engage in that sort of ignorance; we have to be smarter than that. And saying "I know you are but what am I?" is not being smart.