Canaries in a Room of Crows
Ashland, Or. Sept. 8, 08. 40 years ago this summer. Activists filled the streets of Chicago. Demanding a voice where once there was deception. In a war. Now. 60’s protestors are called “terrorists” and a professor who was once in that league can become a red alert. Nothing much has changed in the way a government lies to it’s people. Fear the great drug. Love painting the faces of memory. While oil moguls are dancing in the streets watching Rome burn. And Indian Country has seen all this before. SOUND BITE: Updates on recent 3rd arrest per murder of Anna Mae Aquash, notes on UK author Serle Chapman “paid informant/co-operating witness”, Annie Mae “alive in ’76” and legal team events leading up to the Rapid City, S. Dakota, John Graham Murder Trial, Oct. 6, 2008“Canaries in a Room of Crows”
about the Murder of Anna Mae Aquash (1945-1975/6) and the upcoming trial of John Graham, S. Tutchone
by antoinette nora claypoole
dedicated to Anna Mae Pictou Aquash (1945-1975/6)
“With Graham's trial coming up on October 6th in Rapid City, S.D., it is an opportune time to remind people about who the thugs were that perpetuated the Oglala Civil War of the 1970's. The government has the capability and experience in fabricating their records and evidence. They gained experience from their mistakes.” –Ben Carnes Aug. 22, 08
Ashland, Or. Sept. 8, 08. 40 years ago this summer. Activists filled the streets of Chicago. Demanding a voice where once there was deception. In a war. Now. 60’s protestors are called “terrorists” and a professor who was once in that league can become a red alert. Nothing much has changed in the way a government lies to it’s people. Fear the great drug. Love painting the faces of memory. While oil moguls are dancing in the streets watching Rome burn. And Indian Country has seen all this before.
Ragged, half blank, names blotted out. FBI documents from early 1976. Teletyped archives. “Armed and dangerous. Anna Mae Aquash aka Anna Mae Pictou.” Seen at one point driving “a blue mustang” on Pine Ridge Indian Reservation. And then. Trying to “free Banks” and working at “Fitzgerald’s Place” a tavern in Oklahoma City. All this weeks after she was supposed to have been murdered by Arlo Looking Cloud and John Graham. What are witnesses to believe in any of this?
Notes from FBI files contradict themselves. About this murder that happened in the American Indian Movement (AIM) over 30 years ago. One person found guilty, Arlo Looking Cloud. While others are awaiting trial. For a murder which has now become so important for the U. S. Attorney in S, Dakota to solve that he continues to investigate other suspects.
Recent Marshall Arrest
For just as a First Nations man (Yukon Territory, B.C.), John Graham, awaits trial for the murder of Anna Mae Aquash, M’ikmaq member of AIM in the 1970’s, a “new crop” of suspects in the Anna Mae murder seem to be vanquished. Consider Vine Richard “Dick” Marshall, an AIMster who was released on parole in 2000. For another murder committed in Indian Country over 25 years ago while acting as the body guard for Russell Means, early AIM leader and now famous Hollywood icon. In late August 2008 Marshall was indicted and arrested on charges of “aiding and abetting” in the murder of Aquash.
Three members of AIM have been charged per the execution in `1975/6. One already convicted, two more indicted and envelopes of other possible suspects may still be stashed in the desk of the U.S. Attorney. Perhaps intersecting current grand juries and past investigations.
“We have sealed envelopes waiting to be served” asst. U.S. Attorney Robert Mandel explained back in March of 2004.
Robert Robideau, living in Portland, Oregon, former Spokesperson Leonard Peltier Defense Committee and an informal information source in this case insists however “There are no envelopes. These indictments are because Looking Cloud is coming forward now with information”. How does Robideau know. I can’t answer that. Neither can he.
Either way. A secret key has unlocked Pandora’s box.
And envelopes or not, indictments are being laid in the hands of old AIM activists like cracker jack prizes.
Yet. Not one informer, FBI or “outsider” has been named as playing a role in Aquash’s execution.
The search for AIM people who will sing continues. But why?
Perhaps the need becomes more pressing as the Defense multiplies it’s research, even suggesting a potential alibi for Graham, per Pacer, an online source for motions in federal court.
Hoping for “canaries” some in Indian Country claim the Prosecution will find it easy to name Graham as the murderer, especially in light of a rigourous Graham Defense team which has surprised some who thought this trial might be another Looking Cloud, dog and pony show. Looking Cloud had a trial of 3 ½ days. He was accused and found guilty of being with Graham and killing Aquash, with his defense calling a mere single witness, FBI agent David Price. Perhaps the need for new “blood” stems from the potential Graham alibi, or DNA evidence finally released in early summer. Either way, according to claims in the Marshall indictment, he gave Graham the gun that killed Aquash, alledgedly on Dec. 12, 1975. This could seal the Prosecution’s deal.
Robideau, who is close to the Looking Cloud camp explains further: “Without Looking Cloud’s testimony Marshall would never have been arrested. Looking Cloud is ready to talk now that he has a support system. And we need someone to finger Graham”. Grasping hands in gestures of not so long ago lynchings, many applaud the new “evidence”.
Over the years, In all this. Robideau's commitment to finding the truth runs as deep as the history of Aquash's belief in her people. She was betrayed. He was to have "protected her" as part of NW AIM.
Still. She died. Something inside her activist ways was not returned to her in kind by those in AIM who believed she was a "snitch". Robideau's role is complex and he believes "she was set-up", simple as that.
History of Anna Mae
With this COINTELPRO road show. Let’s retrace the steps that lead us here.
It was over 20 years ago when I first heard her name, Anna Mae Aquash, here in the Pacific Northwest. Almost ten years after she had been executed. And only a couple years after stumbling into Indian Country. I remember the night vividly.
Her name didn’t come easily. It wasn’t spoken because people talked about Aquash as a heroine, a warrior who helped Indian kids at the Red School house in Minneapolis. It wasn’t because of her courage in taking her young daughters to a political rally in Washington, D.C., the BIA takeover back in the early 70’s. It wasn’t even “hey Anna Mae” because someone was bragging about her work with the elders on Pine Ridge and her trying to help protect water rights and prevent uranium mining there inside the remote world of Indian Country, barren, poverty infested, warped history lessons of massacre, Rosebud, Pine Ridge, Bear Butte. Nope. It wasn’t for Anna Mae’s courage and bravado, like she was someone Marlon Brando woulda starred against if he’d had the chance.
Nope. I heard about Anna Mae Aquash because people said, quietly, “Yes she was with AIM. But we think she was a snitch, that’s why she was killed”. I spend 10 years researching her life, death and friends to prove them wrong. She was not a fed, but was set-up by the FBI to appear as a threat. To AIM.
In many ways the hands of time have been pushed back by the grown daughters, the dead activists, the young children and dying elders. All speaking in harmonic wails of fright. Who killed Annie Mae? Many journalists, Michael Donnelly, Rex Wyler, many writers Steve Hendricks and Serle Chapman, famous UK writer who recently (summer 08) is alleged to have been working as a “federal informant.” This according to court documents filed on behalf of John Graham in August. Located on Pacer.
All these people have done their time. Asking questions. Serving justice. Writing stories. About “who killed annie mae”. But me? My mind my fingers are on my own pulse, still alive, I say.
My eyes drift like a death walk. Back into the heartbeat of a Pacific Northwest audience. An event myself and local activists organized: “Apartheid in America”. One night that late winter weekend International Treaty Council person Tom LaBlanc brought an 8mm flick up from San Francisco. It was called “Brave Hearted Woman” and there I heard Annie Mae’s name. Saw her death in the eyes of all of us, like headlights on an Oregon highway which Robert Robideau still claims “did her in. That November (1975) bust here in Oregon was her death sentence, antoinette”.
Anna Mae’s execution went unnoticed, undiscussed by federal authorities AND AIM activists. For nearly 20 years. And then something happened.
Branscombe Searching for Killers
Her second cousin, Robert Pictou Branscombe was approached by “an agent of some kind” according to Branscombe, in an interview I did with him back in the mid 90’s. The “agent” came up to him at a pow wow in Arizona and said “look at this”.
It was a file, according to Branscombe, which had photos and details about Anna Mae. Branscombe had never heard of her and didn’t grasp the depth of what he had just fancy danced into. Death, murder, lies, secrets, brutal betrayal, lovers and friends colluding with paranoia that Anna Mae was an agent.
Branscombe talked to his mum. “Was she our relative?”
Yes was the answer he got. His mother and Annie Mae were cousins. And everyone back in Nova Scotia, at that time, was still afraid to talk about Annie Mae. Just like it was in MY part of the world. Silence the mantra. Branscombe broke the spell.
He searched, travelled and found people who talked about what happened to his cousin. When he came out with who he felt killed Anna Mae it began what is culminating in Rapid City this Fall, October 6. John Graham, from the Yukon Territory, accused of murder of his friend.
But when Branscombe named Graham there were other names mentioned. The recent arrest now becomes no mystery.
There were “5 or 6 of you” Branscombe said in a public statement published on the web pages of Jordan S. Dill. Back in the late 90’s. And Branscombe claimed some of them were agents who his cousin had discovered as feds. Back then there was even talk of “another Anna Mae”, an imposter, who may have been stirring paranoia about Aquash by posing as a friendly to the FBI.
Serle Chapman, UK writer turns “State”
Fast Forward, back to now.
Dennis Bank's wife at the time of Aquash's murder, Kamook Banks, turned state, a shock revealled back during the Looking Cloud trial. People were tasered as this "warrior" from the old days turns out to be wiring herself to record conversastions with her former husband. A marriage of activists as snitches was made public. With another player making his debut this summer.
Under the guise of finding Aquash’s murderer, paid informants in this case make a New York parade on Thanksgiving Day look lean. A Revolution against the Brits “aint seen nothing yet”. For as UK author Serle Chapman, who now lives in S. Dakota, is added to the informant “co-operating witness” list, one has to wonder “who is next”.
Chapman was paid by the U.S. Government after “cooperating” with their investigation, receiving over $70,000, according to online, Pacer docket files. From August 08 in the U.S. vs John Graham. Posing as a writer and friend to Indians. Taping interviews which Chapman would later turn over to federal prosecutors.Items which may possibly include a “secret”, mystery tape originally circulated about the Graham case a few years back. A recording of Graham which some speculate may have been conducted by Chapman in Canada before Graham was extradited in 2007. This all according to a quiet, piercing buzz in Indian Country.
Chapman had many people believing he was “just a writer”. Including controversial prosecution witness, one time friend to Anna Mae and former Chairman of AIM, John Trudell. Trudell wrote a book introduction for one of Chapman’s projects which places the old AIM figure into a less than poetic chapter of “colluding with the enemy”. Or did he innocently, as so many other of Chapman’s fans, “get taken in” by feeling important enough to have a white guy from Europe want to “tell your story”?? Hard to tell. Still.
Hitherto a poster child for Indian Country, Chapman, best known for a myriad of popular “Indian books” has a rather huge role in all this. Aug. 08 court documents filed by the Defense, and response by the courts (Sept. 08) confirm receipt of funds by Chapman from the U.S. Government, for at best “being a paid informant”, at least “co-operating with the Prosecution”. A decision regarding details of his role was handed down by the court on Sept. 4, 08 and another, sealed from public viewing, on Sept. 8th. And the quest for more witness continues.
Freelance writers not immune, an offer made to me by the Prosecution in July 08 was far less exotic. “Tell your lawyer to talk to me if she needs money”. I politely refused but was told “Don’t worry, all the other journalists we contacted are co-operating”. Finding an attorney is less spendy than life as a betrayer of civil liberties. As journalists we are still able--in theory-- to secure our sources, sanity and neutrality. In fact, this doesn't come without a series of random events, akin to small pox blankets. A story best left for another news clip.
But maybe there’s a reason for all this. Perhaps the quest for “new witnesses” comes because there are still others unnamed in the investigations, events which lead to Aquash’s execution which are begging to be known. And. Like Professor Plum in the library being nuked inside a mushroom cloud. Holding a lit candlestick to time illuminates little of the brutal mystery.
Faulty FBI Files: Anna Mae alive in 1976?
From all corners of this brutal murder, the indictments--including the recent Marshall arrest--and claims of innocence fail to convince. Why? Because missing in all the attempts to resolve and wrap murder in a post-colonial blanket of truth is a failure to address inconsistencies in FBI files. And the chilling fact that Federal investigations have employed “snitches” and continue to offer revenue to informants who “cooperate” . With that, claims to justice appear less than operant.
Specifically because varied realities about Aquash, where she was seen (or not), who killed her and why, continue to defy the ravages of time.
There are defense and prosecution teams who pursue justice and desire resolve in this case, yet what is emerging in 2008 Rapid City, S. Dakota are a series of events and court documents which sometimes contradict, oftentimes blur the clear path to truth.
That is, a weave around the murder theory which might be fraying.
And. Yes. There is more to the story. As a Leonard Peltier support organizer, Els from a popular Indian e-newlist says “If we wrote this and gave the script to Hollywood they’d never buy it. They’d say the whole thing’s too far fetched”.
This past month (Aug.2008) the defense for John Graham, John Murphy of Rapid City, S. Dakota, made surprising court requests. It appears Murphy has filed request pertaining to it’s knowledge that an FBI file written in Feb. 1976 claims that Annie Mae Aquash was seen alive two months after Graham is alleged to have killer her. “Wearing blue jeans.....and moccasins” somewhere on Pine Ridge. In Feb. 1976.
Why is this important?
The obvious. Because John Graham is accused of killing Annie Mae before Christmas, 1975 and various, unauthenticated FBI reports claim what appears to be multiple Annie Mae sightings weeks AFTER Aquash was supposedly shot and killed, on Dec. 12, 1975 by Graham.
It’s not the first time the “Annie Mae alive” theory has been spun, but the first time a legal team has taken the words and dressed them in defense of the accused.
“Pictou was wearing blue jeans, a red scarf, a long brown coat and moccasins”, from an FBI memorandum sent on Feb. 19, 1976. Two months to the day. After the alleged Aquash murder. I have to keep saying that. Over and over. Wrapping myself, us, around the new spin. Reading these scanned pages I finally stop. A pause, a prayer for all the times Aquash and others were, have been, watched and detailed. The tattoo on a shoulder, the nuance of slinging burgers, all become sentences which document our lives. Through the eyes of spies.
The agent listed at the top of scanned, aging and faded page in a PDF bleeds through. Special Agent. David Price. Appears. To have written about the blue jean Annie Mae sighting. From a source who remains anonymous, per FBI policy to redact (withhold) names. Despite efforts by the Graham Defense to have the name released per prior legal cases where are sources are not “unequivocally” protected, a ruling by Judge Duffy on Sept. 4, 2008 dismissed the FBI file as “a mistake” that is proven by Aquash’s “decomposed body”. Yet, 1976 coroner reports she was “partially decomposed” and suggested Aquash was exposed for 7-10 days. Before being found. That would put her ALIVE on Feb. 12, 1976. If we believe the faulty coroner.
The Sept. 08 ruling to keep “secret” the one witness who might help Graham in his defense is a blow. To the matrix of all who want justice. If it was a mistake, let the informer explain to us. To a jury. Why not? The ruling perplexes. The judge’s disregard for the government’s own reporting and file keeping is less suspicious than it is revealing. Nothing is what it seems and reports are only true if the court favors their content. Perhaps. Still. The questions linger.
Who was the informant?
And why didn’t anyone, including Price, mention this in Looking Cloud’s trial? I wonder out loud. No worries about secrets. Price, an FBI agent who allegedly threatened Annie Mae before she was killed was also the infamous sole ominous “witness for the defense” in that Feb. 04 murder trial.
Price. A man described by Robideau as “Little Custer”.....who wrote the three Poor Bear affidavits used to extradite LP {Leonard Peltier} back to the U.S.... that the Government later admits were fabricated..... should we believe his reports now?”
Robideau’s rant is adamant and he answers his own question. Yet. There are more.
Fragments of files attempting to confirm this bizarre turn. Arrive. Via Robideau. Teletyped reports claiming Aquash alive was a mistake. But for other reasons Another sighting her in a mustang. Filed by unnamed informants in and around AIM. 1976. Sent out to Portland, Denver, Rapid City. Unauthenticated, they nonetheless create dust devils in a prairie of cisterns. The vague oasis blurred.
When seen in teletype, though, something still takes hold; “Anna Mae Aquash....January 28, 1976 driving en route Tulsa. Oklahoma, in white over red 1975 Pontiac Grand Prix....vehicle reportedly owned by Aquash...she is former wife of (name deleted) who is reportedly in Oklahoma City Territory at present time and she may be planning to meet him”.
Can the intersection of past and present get more complex? You bet.
Branscombe and his “5 or 6 of you” proclamation. Comes to mind. And. The early ’76, “other Annie Mae” theory. Running around Indian Country. An imposter? A coincidence that another AIM activist had the same first name, Anna Mae?
An email from someone who doesn’t want his name in print, asking to remain anonymous gets into the frayed fabric of deception: “There is Anna Mae Tanaquodle in Oklahoma who was originally thought to be Aquash until the FBI interviewed her. It was this “other Annie Mae” who was around confusing people”. This is sent my way to “prove” it would seem, that any Annie Mae sighting can be explained by the Oklahoma, potential informant/imposter “Anna Mae” working at Fitzgerald’s Place.
The Other Annie Mae
A blown tire in this road trip lets no one get to be who they say they are. The questions persist.
Was this “other Annie Mae” a federal agent? Was it really HER that the FBI says was driving mustang, a grand prix, going to see her husband? Was the “other Annie Mae” intentionally targetting Aquash as fed, impersonating, with an FBI alliance which would cost Aquash her life? Or was Aquash still alive and the tag you’re it game was in play?
Though most in Indian Country confirm a packet of extensive, authenticated FBI records exist. Others believe that the whole thing is a sideshow.
The documents by the Defense which mention Annie Mae alive are “razzle, dazzle. Nothing but bullshit” Robideau explains as though he we offering a closing statement back in the day. “This is nothing but creative writing on the part of the defense” Robideau reads the riot act about it all. And believes that the Marshall arrest is less historic than canarylike—“All we needed was someone else to name Graham.....even if Looking Cloud doesn’t talk, again, we have Marshall now”. And they wouldn’t have Marshall, without Looking Cloud, according to a source close to the case who explains that Looking Cloud left jail to talk at a recent grand jury in Sioux Falls. Perhaps.
Ragged FBI teletype once again arrests the spin. “....Individual thought to be subject Aquash in reality Tulsa AIM activist”, reported on Feb. 19, 1976 in those raggedy ass scanned papers.
Trying to authenticate the files sent to me, random pages of "Anna Mae sightings" , I contact Michael Kuzma, FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) attorney for Leonard Peltier. After a visit to Peltier in Pa. prison, late Aug. 08, Kuzma reviews the copies: "some of these files are tampered with, unauthentic. Look at the typeface on one of these pages, for instance. And what are those page numbers. Those don’t exist on FBI files”. With eyes like a redtail hawk hovering over an interstate of hungry commuters, Kuzma can neither locate "originals" in his personal files of "resmurs" which includes Aquash documents, nor does he believe the copies I have are necessarily authentic.
Maybe someone wants me to believe things that aren't true. There's a novel idea. People trying to force feed me a story.
“Wowsie, haven’t been here before, right?” I lie.
We both laugh nervously. We talk of the difficulty, the brutal fact that truth is elusive in his profession. A mere reflection of pandemic imperfection in the human condition. I sort through the stacks of questions on my laptop PDF’s. And wish I had a way to rewrite time.
Perhaps the FBI files were sent because many in Indian Country have a very clear agenda. We’ll just leave it at that.
It’s true. Many in Indian Country are staunch believers that Graham murdered Annie Mae, that Graham pulled the trigger in Dec. 1975. It’s true. That Robideau is not alone. In his belief that “Graham is finished”. Quite definitively. Most everyone I have spoken with in the 5 years--since early indictments were handed down--most everyone I talk with believes Graham raped and killed his friend. Anna Mae Aquash.
Yet. Graham’s defense, in soliciting for DNA testing (per the rape accusation) and in unearthing an FBI Annie Mae sighting long after she was supposed to be dead. Graham defense defied, for a moment, the ghost of imagination.
For even as Graham supporter Matthew Lien, back in 2006 called for “anyone who saw Annie Mae at Christmas time, 1975, please contact us” I suddenly remembered an eerie sighting myself. Something about a “Paula Giese” website. That was sent to me when I first started writing my book for Annie Mae, to break the warped silence about her life. The early 1990’s website was supposed stories about “Annie Mae’s last Christmas” 1975.
Many times I have been told, sometimes I have been threatened and most times I had ear muffs on. “Don’t talk about the timeline, antoinette”. More than one hardy seasoned character talked to me like this.
As the trial is only 6 weeks away, I wonder what kind of sound proof rooms the defense has.
And am even more curious about “the other Annie Mae” documents and how they may, or may not, surface to deafen more muted ears.
That is, as I write this inside my own quest for neutrality and civil liberties of writers, there is an imagining that the frayed weave of “truth” be challenged. To reinvent itself as a warm blanket, wrapping murder tightly into the psyches of everyone who knows what happened. And can never tell.
Heroes and Snitches
This game of informants in a Movement is being played not only within Indian Country but as a green show. For an entire new generation of activists who may watch in awe as the Federal Government continues to drag up people from the past. Who are expected to be like singing canaries in a room full of crows. No one is shocked. Indians always seems to get the small pox blankets before the rest. “It always happens first Indian Country” the old guys used to say.
Finding, indicting, arresting and convicting. Still. The resolve to actually grasp the events which surrounded the murder of Anna Mae Aquash continue to remain elusive. The successful quest for “new witnesses” promises even more work for the Defense, and potentially more paid “informant” testimonies for the Prosecution. Quite a plethora of needs. The case, nonetheless, continues to serve various camps who either want to see AIM take the rap for Aquash’s death or have a need to hide facts about paid informants who may have silenced her. Because she “knew too much” as both her cousin Branscombe and friend Trudell used to tout.
Maybe Ben Carnes, an AIM activist from Colorado says it best, in a recent piece he wrote for Leonard Peltier:
“In the Aquash case, it seems strange that all of a sudden the Justice Department and FBI are being cast as heroes in solving the case.....if Graham is convicted, then will the case be over for Indians? Will "justice" be served on a plate of BS and greedily devoured by anti-AIMers and the media?”
The verdict is not in on either front. Though it doesn’t take a political historian or a collection of fries in a happy meal. To guess. That none of this will be over anytime soon.
The Graham trial, now scheduled for October 6, 2008 in Rapid City, S. Dakota, may do what so many quests accomplish. Frame the questions in ways that answers are inconceivable to fathom. To renounce or embrace. The summer of love is long gone. Or, maybe it’s like an old Indian guy once told me “sometimes you White people ask too many questions. Just watch. The things around you. You’ll learn alot that way”.
And then there’s that ominous anonymous email I received the day before the Marshall arrest “it ain’t over after Graham”.
The beat goes on is all I could reply.
&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&
Ben Carnes quotes used w/permission by author.
“Pictou was wearing blue jeans, a red scarf, a long brown coat and moccasins”
--FBI report, Feb. 12, 1976
-------
Resources/Links for "Canaries in a Room of Crows"
1. Court Documents and Rulings in the U.S. vs John Graham: Aug., Sept. 08
www.grahamdocuments.blogspot.com
2. PACER: Federal Court Docket
http://pacer.psc.uscourts.gov/
3. antoinette nora claypoole: current statement re Journalism Civil Liberties: Aug. 08
www.johngrahaminterview.blogspot.com
4.Graham Defense Moves for FBI Documents: Aug. 08
http://www.canada.com/topics/news/national/story.html?id=461482c3-fa8e-488c-9b0f-a1b92eb51e9b
5. Extradition of JOHN GRAHAM: Dec. 07
http://www.heyokamagazine.com/HEYOKA.10.JohnGraham.1.htm
6. HISTORY of John Graham Hearings in VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA: 2003-07
http://www.antoinetteclaypoole.blogspot.com/
7. Looking CLoud Trial/John Trudell testimony: AUDIO: PACIFICA RADIO BROADCAST ARCHIVE from Looking Cloud Trial: antoinette, 2. 03
http://heyokamagazine.com/HEYOKA.9.Antoinetteclaypoole.ArloTrial.htm
8. Looking Cloud Trial/Kamook Banks testimony:
www.lookingcloudpieces.blogspot.com
9. Graham Defense Committee: Annie Mae at Christmas: spring 06
http://antoinetteclaypoole.blogspot.com/2006/08/annie-mae-alive-at-christmas-1975.html
10. Statements from Annie Mae’s family: 05, 07
http://anniemaefamily.blogspot.com/
11. This is Leonard Peltier” by Ben Carnes: Aug. 08
http://bsnorrell.blogspot.com/2008/08/ben-carnes-peltier-justice-and.html
12. antoinette nora claypoole bio/WORK: current/past
http://www.antoinettewritings.blogspot.com