Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth

Welcome to Infoshop News
Saturday, July 31 2010 @ 04:08 PM UTC

Building an Anti-Economy

Economy CrumblesEven while capitalism continues its inexorable push to corral every square inch of the globe into its logic of money and markets, new practices are emerging that redefine politics and open up spaces of unpredictability. Instead of traditional political forms like unions or parties, people are coming together in practical projects, from urban gardening in vacant lots to the suddenly ubiquitous do-it-yourself bike shops. More and more people, recognizing the degradation inherent in business relations, are creating networks of activity that refuse the measurement of money. They depend instead on sharing skills and technological know-how within new communities, such as the biofuels co-ops that have proliferated in many cities. Networks have grown, thanks to the spread of the Internet and other telecommunications techologies, and new kinds of "families" based on shared values, alternative living arrangements, and non-economic relationships are growing within the old society. Building an Anti-Economy

by Chris Carlsson
September 6, 2008
by Orion Magazine

Even while capitalism continues its inexorable push to corral every square inch of the globe into its logic of money and markets, new practices are emerging that redefine politics and open up spaces of unpredictability. Instead of traditional political forms like unions or parties, people are coming together in practical projects, from urban gardening in vacant lots to the suddenly ubiquitous do-it-yourself bike shops. More and more people, recognizing the degradation inherent in business relations, are creating networks of activity that refuse the measurement of money. They depend instead on sharing skills and technological know-how within new communities, such as the biofuels co-ops that have proliferated in many cities. Networks have grown, thanks to the spread of the Internet and other telecommunications techologies, and new kinds of "families" based on shared values, alternative living arrangements, and non-economic relationships are growing within the old society.

Collectively, I call these projects "Nowtopia." Rarely do the individual participants conceive of them in political terms; day-to-day issues about how we live, what we do, how we define and meet our needs tend to be understood as outside politics. But all Nowtopian activities are profoundly political.

The Nowtopian movement embodies a growing minority seeking emancipation from the treadmill of consumerism and overwork. Acting locally in the face of unfolding global catastrophes, friends and neighbors are redesigning many of the crucial technological foundations of modern life, like food and transportation. These redesigns are worked out through garage and backyard research-and-development programs among friends using the detritus of modern life. Our contemporary commons takes the shape of discarded bicycles and leftover deep-fryer oil, of vacant lots and open bandwidth. "Really, really free markets," anti-commodities, and free services are imaginative products of an anti-economy provisionally under construction by freely cooperative and inventive people. They aren't waiting for an institutional change from on high but are building the new world in the shell of the old.

These practices require sharing and mutual aid and constitute the beginnings of new kinds of communities. Because these people are engaged in creative appropriation of technologies to purposes of their own design and choice, these activities embody the (partial) transcendence of the wage-labor prison by workers who have better things to do than their jobs. They are tinkerers working in the waste streams and open spaces of late capitalism, conjuring new practices while redefining life's purpose.

Efforts to create islands of utopia have always flourished on the margins of capitalist society, but never to the extent that a radically different way of living has been able to supplant market society's daily life. Nowtopians, and anyone determined to free themselves from the constraints of economically defined life, face the same historic limits that have beset all previous efforts to escape. Can the emerging patterns resist the co-optation and reintegration that have absorbed past self-emancipatory movements? The new apparatus of global production helps speed up the extension of market society, but it inevitably also speeds the spread of social opposition, the sharing of experiments and alternatives. Our moment in history is at least as exhilarating as it is daunting.

Share
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Ask
  • Kirtsy
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Twitter
  • SlashDot
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Fark
  • Del.icio.us
  • Blogmarks
  • Yahoo Buzz

Trackback

Trackback URL for this entry: http://news.infoshop.org/trackback.php?id=20080907112153874

Here's what others have to say about 'Building an Anti-Economy':

Building an Anti-Economy « Native Living
Tracked on Saturday, September 20 2008 @ 12:52 PM UTC

Building an Anti-Economy | 9 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
Building an Anti-Economy
Authored by: HPWombat on Sunday, September 07 2008 @ 12:22 PM UTC
Squatopia!

---
embrace the dork side
Building an Anti-Economy
Authored by: engine summer on Monday, September 08 2008 @ 10:15 AM UTC
my, my! yes the kids have been up to some new tricks in the years since you gave bob black's ID to the sfpd. unfortunately, as attractive as it may seem to surf the trends, i dont think the way youre grouping guerrilla gardening, biodiesel cars, bike co-ops, telecommunications, "alternative living arrangements", and really free markets really makes sense. do all these things really "refuse the measurement of money" and are they all "profoundly political"?

the biodiesel craze is certainly turning into a bonanza for "green" capitalists, some of whom have been buying up that used deep-fryer oil you call "our commons", which is ironic considering the devastation its production inflicts on many rural communities. the bike co-op, which presumably rents its space, can have similar problems like stimulating trendy and consumerist bicycle culture, (not to mention helping people believe riding a bike is inherently revolutionary). sure, bikes are handy, cheap, relatively clean, like some of the other trends youve name checked here. people have shared practical survival skills in the shell of the old world for centuries; they are good things to know, but how do we get RID of the old world?? i have to ask if youre sure these "new kinds of communities" are "growing within the old society", and if so, why do they find such fertile ground there? this is totally missing in the praise of vacant lots, rusty bikes, the few frequencies yet unpolluted with electromagnetic radiation, and other errata of technological society (as well as its hypertrophied fruits like the internet). it may be that industrial waste products are the only "commons" for the exploited of the near future, but surely this would be nothing to celebrate!

finally, what about this equation you make at the end between technological development and "social opposition"? if you mean "loyal opposition" i agree with you because it seems like thats all your "nowtopians" are so far.
Building an Anti-Economy
Authored by: HPWombat on Monday, September 08 2008 @ 11:11 AM UTC
Good points. I think identifying that anti-authoritarians participate in these projects is one thing, but pressing them into an ideological practice is quite another. There is a large number of anarchists that don't participate in protest culture nor the "nowtopian" schemes mentioned.

Ultimately I would attribute these projects mixed with protest culture for the insular and scene driven aspects of the anarchist milieu. In suburbs and small college towns, this is probably the only public face of the anarchist community. In large cities, nowtopian schemes seem to blend with hip culture and left activism.

Interpretative communities are bound to happen when individuals share time and discourse together. I can only hope that by lumping these ideas into "nowtopia" that we can see them for their flaws and understand that nowtopia exists when we ignore the outside world.

---
embrace the dork side
Building an Anti-Economy
Authored by: Admin on Monday, September 08 2008 @ 11:44 AM UTC
People who complain about the "anarchist scene" (not HpWombat) are part of the problem, not the solution.

I have issues with these examples of practical anarchism being labeled as "Nowtopia", just like I have issues with Michael Albert's project to make anarchist economics palatable to liberals as "paraecon."

I really have no time anymore for anarchists who whine about anarchists who do "Really, Really Free Markets", bike collectives and infoshops. Like it or not, these are anarchists who are putting their ideas into practice and setting examples which attracts more people to anarchism. For the fucking life of me, I just don't get anarchists who whine about other anarchists ACTUALLY PRACTICING THEIR ANARCHIST IDEAS. OK, I can understand why the nihilists would reject this stuff, but the rest of the armchair anarchists need to put up or shut up.

Against big talkers,

Chuck
Building an Anti-Economy
Authored by: engine summer on Monday, September 08 2008 @ 12:54 PM UTC
this article doesnt mention infoshops, or even anarchists, although it does mention biodiesel, the internet, and a bunch of other tech trends it lumps together into a "movement", which is apparently the foreward motion of progress itself, whose waste stream carlsson sees as our commons. he does touch on practices of low tech folk science and skillsharing for survival, which is great, but the rest of it really doesnt hang together, much less relate to an anarchist revolutionary project - at least thats how i see it. i argue and ask questions because i want answers, not because im trying to infuriate you. if you dont have anything to say to the points i raise, you dont need to address things i didnt say.
Building an Anti-Economy
Authored by: Admin on Monday, September 08 2008 @ 01:57 PM UTC
Well, that was my Monday morning cranky rant. ;-)

I hope that all anarchists have gotten off the biodiesel bandwagon. What a fucking capitalist scam. That's a fucking liberal bandaid that won't scale up and also distracts people from attacking the more fundamental problem: capitalism.
Building an Anti-Economy
Authored by: Why on Monday, September 08 2008 @ 01:40 PM UTC
You don't "build" an anti-economy, it simply exists naturally. The article in question is only referencing activities that are natural progressions away from capitalist consumerism and toward a freer egalitarian consumerism / conservationism, able to fullfill needs without the monotany of work and authoriarianism necessary to maintain the status quo. Granted within these groups capitalism has and continues to take hold, but it cannot have as strong as grip as it would want, that much is certain. For instance, you might be stealing bandwidth (a good anti-capitalist thing to do) to put music on your iPod (paying for such a commodity being an abbhorant attachment to capitalist consumerism), the end result is the same. Capitalism loses.

A friend of mine who works at a repair center for electronics found an iPod with 1800 songs on it. She mirrored the drive and is walking around with $1800 worth of capitalist music. It's great! And there was nothing to 'build' in that anti-economic activity. It just was an opportunity waiting to happen.
Building an Anti-Economy
Authored by: engine summer on Monday, September 08 2008 @ 01:53 PM UTC
right, so we could talk about anti-economic activity in terms of theft or sabotage, but he doesnt come near that. scavenging is one thing but using the internet depends on a massive infrastructure for communications, electricity generation etc. which is only produced by the exploitive economy. or renting the bike co op, whatever... at best these projects sidestep modern capitalism, and some of the ones he suggests are downright friendly to it. there is nothing anarchist about his model.
Building an Anti-Economy
Authored by: Why on Monday, September 08 2008 @ 04:18 PM UTC
I want internet, but I don't want an exploitive economy, so what do I do? I set up an intranet in my local community, and we leech off of the capitalists in the meantime.

Another local community wants internet, but they don't want an exploitive economy, so what do they do? They look at our intranet, and copy it, then we plug our intranets into one another and pow, we have a somewhat larger internet.

This goes on until a whole region is covered in a grid that is run by the communities for the communities, in a system of goodwill self-interest. Mutual aid as self-interested behavior.

Anti-economy at work without there being anyone "building" anything. It exists not because there's an effort to create a massive global internet (the capitalist way of things), but because some people want some small connections to one another which just so happen are able to benefit everyone else and bring everyone together.

Because I believe anarchism is a natural tendency when force and control are eliminated, I would argue that indeed the behaviors he is talking about are anarchist. You don't have to ask for permission to plug into my intranet.

You can take this concept and extend it further, it just requires technologies that are easier to create and share, and I see nothing within any technologies you listed (electricity and the like) that precludes it from being shared in that manner.