Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth

Welcome to Infoshop News
Tuesday, February 09 2010 @ 06:54 PM UTC

FBI confidential informant also said to be provocateur

According to activists from Des Moines, Philadelphia, Miami, Sacramento, and other locations, a young woman named "Anna" allegedly infiltrated peace and justice rallies and anarchist meetings, and even attempted to join protests against the Democratic National Committee (DNC) ahead of the DNC's national convention last year as a paid FBI confidential "informant." Activists say that she has tried to provoke conflict at various advocacy events and violent incidents with police to get people arrested. In other words, Anna is not just an informant, she may be a provocateur.

FBI confidential informant also said to be provocateur

Jennifer Van Bergen
Published: Thursday June 8, 2006
RAW STORY

According to activists from Des Moines, Philadelphia, Miami, Sacramento, and other locations, a young woman named "Anna" allegedly infiltrated peace and justice rallies and anarchist meetings, and even attempted to join protests against the Democratic National Committee (DNC) ahead of the DNC's national convention last year as a paid FBI confidential "informant." Activists say that she has tried to provoke conflict at various advocacy events and violent incidents with police to get people arrested. In other words, Anna is not just an informant, she may be a provocateur.

Although she is known among activist groups as either Anna Davies or Anna Davidson, others know her as Grai Damiani. She focuses her efforts largely on "anarchist" groups.

The McDavid Case

In January 2006, Eric McDavid, Lauren Weiner, and Zachary Jenson were arrested in California and charged with knowingly conspiring to use fire or explosives to damage property. Their arrest was the direct result of work by Anna, who was "deeply embedded within the subjects' cell," according to FBI documents.

The FBI affidavit in support of the complaint against the three defendants states that they planned on their own to engage in "direct action" – which the FBI agent equated with criminal activity – apparently without Anna's input or guidance. The direct action involved bombing one or several locations in California.

However, McDavid's attorney, Mark Reichel, states that Anna was always pushing McDavid to do something criminal, taught the three how to make the bombs, supervised their activities, and repeatedly threatened to leave them if they didn't start doing "something."

McDavid allegedly wanted to target banks, commercial trucks, mountaintop removal projects in West Virginia, Communist party office, and the U.S. Forest Service Institute of Forest Genetics in California, according to the affidavit.

The affidavit, which was written by FBI Special Agent Nasson Walker, shows that the agency has identified the Earth Liberation Front (ELF) as "a recognized eco-terrorist group," which Walker states has been involved in over $100 million dollars worth of damage since 1997. Walker further notes that: "Environmental extremists under the ELF banner have been known to use arson and/or explosives to damage or destroy or attempt to damage or destroy government, commercial, and residential facilities." Walker also states that "ELF adherents share a strong philosophical connection to the anarchist movement," which he notes "seeks to end the current system of government, economy and replace them with systems characterized by a lack of authoritarian/hierarchical relationships." Walker states that all three of the defendants are anarchists.

The FBI claims that Anna has "provided information that has been utilized in at least twelve separate anarchist cases" and that her "information has proved accurate and reliable."

But just who is Anna and what makes her reliable?

Organization of American States (OAS) Protests

In June of last year, according to witnesses, Anna showed up in Ft. Lauderdale, Florida for an anti-OAS protest which drew approximately 1200 people. Wearing a shirt with a red cross on it and carrying a bag with the same logo, she appeared on the day the protests began and identified herself as a "medic" from California.

One protester who had become ill during the event was treated by Anna. "She was pushy," said Barbara Collins, a retired Miami resident who says Anna gave her Gatorade with water and then left. "She gave me that drink that made me sick, but later on she didn't seem that interested in treating me. She wanted to get back to the others." Collins was subsequently hospitalized for heat stroke.

Linda Belgrave, a sociology professor at University of Miami, who assisted Collins that day, had to go find Anna again when Barbara got worse. According to Belgrave, Anna told her she was "busy." Belgrave did not see Anna attending to any other person in need of medical attention. She was simply "hanging out" with the "kids."

Indeed, Anna was busy, according to other protesters at the OAS rally.

During the march to the rally where Collins fell ill, one Miami resident, who asked that her name not be used, heard people talking about doing a sit-in. Since the coalition had decided against sit-ins and had negotiated carefully with the police about routes and activities, she warned people individually not to participate in the sit-in. Most did not, but Ray Del Papa from Ft. Lauderdale subsequently saw Anna directing young people to sit down on the street directly in front of a line of police in riot gear. In describing what he saw, Del Papa motions with his arms to show how Anna instructed individuals to sit here and there. Del Papa felt that it was a "set-up," a "trap, similar to what the police did during the protests against the Free Trade Agreement of the Americas (FTAA) in Miami in 2003."

The fences penned the protesters in completely except where the riot police were, which was exactly where Anna instructed the young people to do their sit-in, according to Del Papa.

"She knew they could get their heads bashed in," notes Mark Reichel, based on conversations with the activists. "If you saw their faces as well, you would understand that these people were not lying."

Under the Attorney General's Guidelines, the FBI and prosecutors are required to keep secret the identity of a confidential informant. However, Anna was seemingly "outed" last year by activists who recognized what they saw as disruptive and provocative tactics and posted pictures of her on the internet.

The allegations were later confirmed by Reichel, who identified the unnamed FBI confidential source cited in the January 2006 complaint affidavit for the McDavid case as Anna.

Reichel also viewed hundreds of hours of surveillance tapes of Anna and McDavid and his cohorts. He notes that Anna's forte is identifying "radical" young men and women and "getting them" to fall in love with her.

The FBI will not discuss Anna's status or the specifics of her training or operations but denies that informants are trained to provoke. In response to RAW STORY's queries about Anna, FBI media representative Karen Ernst said that "Sources are admonished not to provoke criminal activity,"

"Sources operated by the FBI are closely monitored and the information received from them is corroborated through other investigative techniques."

Additionally, Ernst explains that the FBI corroborates information obtained from an informant "before charges are brought" against an individual. "Charges are brought when the totality of the evidence is sufficient for either a criminal complaint or indictment. Information from a source would never be the only evidence used to bring charges; other evidence would include recordings, surveillance video, results of witness testimony, etc.," adds Ernst.

Despite being outed, Anna continues to infiltrate groups and presently is living in a collective home with some young people in Iowa, according to Reichel.

Criminal Activity Plus Salary

According to the "Attorney General's Guidelines Regarding the Use of Confidential Informants" (AG Guidelines), a "Confidential Informant" or "CI" is "any individual who provides useful and credible information to [the FBI] regarding felonious criminal activities, and from whom the [FBI] expects or intends to obtain additional useful and credible information regarding such activities in the future."

The FBI conducts a "suitability determination" for each informant, which includes consideration of the candidate's age, affiliations, motivations, reliability, truthfulness, and criminal and drug history.

Every informant receives and must acknowledge her understanding of a written set of instructions, which are reviewed by an agent with the CI. The CI is not allowed to engage in criminal activity without authorization. A CI who is authorized to engage in "Tier 1 Otherwise Illegal Activity" – which includes involvement with violent activities by other persons, corrupt conduct by officials, and trafficking of controlled substances – becomes a "High Level Confidential Informant."

Given Anna's involvement in the McDavid case, where she was involved in allegedly planning violent activities, she became a High Level CI.

According to Ernst, all sources are operated in accordance with the Attorney General's Guidelines. Sources are required to meet on a regular basis with an agent who provides them guidance and instructions.

Yet in a scathing report released by the Department of Justice in September of last year, DOJ inspector general, Glenn A. Fine, found "that FBI agents violated procedures in 87 percent of the cases, including some in which informants allegedly engaged in illegal activity without proper oversight or permission."

As for Anna, she receives about $37,500 a year, plus expenses, for her work. In the McDavid case, for example, in addition to her salary, the FBI paid for Anna to rent a house in California, paid for helicopter surveillance at her behest, and ostensibly also paid for the audio and video surveillance rigged in the rental house.

Are there other Annas?

Although the FBI states that it does not target lawful activity or activity protected by the First Amendment, in Florida alone, groups advocating against the invasion of Iraq, the PATRIOT Act, the OAS, and the FTAA have all been infiltrated, according to participants -- who cannot prove that the suspicious persons were infiltrators or informants. But documents released last year show that a counter-recruitment meeting at the Quaker House in Lake Worth, Florida was infiltrated by the Department of Defense. And the revelations about Anna, who participated in at least two of the major protests in Florida, further confirm activists' fears.

While officials have claimed that anarchists advocate violence, Fred Frost, President of the Florida AFL-CIO, stated in 2004 at public hearings after the FTAA demonstrations that anarchists "may look different from you and me, but they are some of the nicest, most peaceful people I've ever met, helping everyone – I have a great deal of respect for them."

None of the above-mentioned peace and justice groups advocates violence; all advocate using peaceful and lawful means of expression. #

Jennifer Van Bergen is a freelance journalist with a law degree. Her book "The Twilight of Democracy: The Bush Plan for America" is available on Amazon. Her book "Archetypes for Writers: Using the Power of Your Subconscious" will be out next year. She can be reached at jvbxyz@earthlink.net.

Trackback

Trackback URL for this entry: http://news.infoshop.org/trackback.php?id=20060608231344890

Here's what others have to say about 'FBI confidential informant also said to be provocateur':

Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind!
Tracked on Friday, July 04 2008 @ 01:47 PM UTC

conspiracy theories | Blog Archive | FBI Agents to Converge on DNC
Tracked on Friday, July 04 2008 @ 02:13 PM UTC

FBI confidential informant also said to be provocateur | 37 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
FBI confidential informant also said to be provocateur
Authored by: Admin on Thursday, June 08 2006 @ 11:56 PM UTC
I find it hard to believe that this "Anna" person is still able to infiltrate activist groups, given the news coverage about this person on Infoshop, Indymedia and other news outlets. Are we doing a good job of spreading the word about people like "Anna." Should we devote the weekend to spreading this story and pictures of "Anna" to activist lists, bulletin boards, and MySpace networks.

I'm a bit annoyed at the patronizing quote about anarchists being nice people from the AFL-CIO person. We are nice people, but we aren't nice to the government, capitalism, the ruling class, the authorities and so on. Many of us support the use of violence, including myself, who adheres to the diversity of tactics philosophy. There are many, many anarchists who are strictly for nonviolence and we should respect that stance, but there is no excuse for the rest of us to soften our pro-violence stance.

I watched the movie "The Fourth World War" with some comrades tonight. This excellent movie recounts many of the struggles that people around the world have conducted against the rich and powerful. These struggles, be they in Korea, South Africa, Chiapas, Palestine, Argentina, and many more places, are often violent. When the rich and powerful are conducting a war against you, often you have to fight back with violence and similar tactics to simply SURVIVE to live another day in order to fight for another world.

And frankly, I don't think anybody has any right to demand that anarchists to adhere to a strict nonviolence code when the American Empire is so bloody and violent around the world. This violent disruption of our movement by the authorities is just another example of the violence that keeps the state and capitalism in power.

People have a right to fight back and they are fighting back.

C.
FBI confidential informant also said to be provocateur
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, June 09 2006 @ 05:39 AM UTC
i don't see where it suggests she is *still* infiltrating? towards the end of the article the author speculates that other informants/provocateurs may be moving in activist circles. anna herself is probably in some kind of witness protection thing now with her picture all over the internet.

despite the wording of this article it is pretty clear that anna was indeed a provocateur, through her the fbi rented a house and even paid for the alleged bomb making materials, they said so in their affidavit from the auburn 3 arraignment.

another disappointing thing about this article is it doesn't mention the word COINTELPRO once.....
FBI confidential informant also said to be provocateur
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, June 09 2006 @ 05:41 AM UTC
in fact it also leaves out the broader context of the green scare and backfire as a spectacle, which would provide more reasons as to why the fbi would try to entrap people to catch "eco terrorists"
FBI confidential informant also said to be provocateur
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, June 09 2006 @ 07:11 AM UTC
and it plays on the highly-publicized rift between the more settled urban radical communities and the much maligned, traveler crimethinc-ish folks, i.e. "not only will they steal your laundry money, but they may be snithces"
FBI confidential informant also said to be provocateur
Authored by: Admin on Friday, June 09 2006 @ 07:47 AM UTC
"Despite being outed, Anna continues to infiltrate groups and presently is living in a collective home with some young people in Iowa, according to Reichel."
FBI confidential informant also said to be provocateur
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, June 09 2006 @ 08:18 AM UTC
scuse me, i missed that.
i am very curious/doubtful about this information, if it is true why haven't her new housemates been informed?? has anyone heard anything else about this claim?
FBI confidential informant also said to be provocateur
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, June 09 2006 @ 09:43 AM UTC
why would the feds release information on where she lived and the type of house she lives in?

i doubt she'd still be an informant because she can't really be effective anymore now that anarchists around the country know about her. not only would it be impractical for the feds to try that, but for her own sake it could be quite dangerous.
FBI confidential informant also said to be provocateur
Authored by: Admin on Friday, June 09 2006 @ 10:00 AM UTC
I wouldn't be surprised if the FBI was still using "Anna" as an informant. Most anarchists don't read websites like this one and we're lousy about sharing information among our very isolated communities. We are also better at bitching about these problems instead of organizing better anarchist communities. The enemy is the FBI, not your comrades who dress the wrong way or who don't believe the right version of anarchism. It also hurts us when we allow our friends to preach inaction and to complain about how all "protests are boring." If your movement isn't doing anything, then people in it become more isolated and more vulnerable to infiltration like this.

Oh, btw, if somebody tells you to do something at a protest, like "Anna" told protesters where to protest, you are a smart anarchist if you immediately question any such person barking orders, especially if they are using a megaphone. We are anarchists who organize ourselves, not people who take orders from experts, especially at some protest.

C.
FBI confidential informant also said to be provocateur
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, June 09 2006 @ 10:47 AM UTC
sorry, but I gotta ask it...But is our "movement" so spineless as to where a known, proven informant who has been outed, still has mobility within our "communities"? I've been reading about this fucking bitch for months now, yet this is the first I"ve read of her having "re-surfaced". And even though she is alleged to still be floating around people are sitting around talking about her. Is she going to solely wear the scarlet letter (figuratively) and nothing more? We (yes me included) are allowing a known snake in the grass to upset, disrupt, and potentially ruin the lives of our immediate brethren. Where are we headed?
FBI confidential informant also said to be provocateur
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, June 09 2006 @ 11:32 AM UTC
This is the only article I've seen of her being still active in the US. Last I heard she was attempting to infiltrate movements overseas. I've been in contact with comrades in Des Moines and am awaiting their response.
FBI confidential informant also said to be provocateur
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, June 09 2006 @ 01:21 PM UTC
you are a " Bitch-ass Fag"......just kiddin
FBI confidential informant also said to be provocateur
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, June 09 2006 @ 04:55 PM UTC
calling a girl a bitch, does not equate with calling a guy a fag. Calling her a fucking bitch is completely appropriate, or an asshole, or even a cunt. It's not like somebody called her a fucking dyke. That would warrant all the bitching. Stop being so overly P.C. you sound like a little bitch <--tonge in cheek
FBI confidential informant also said to be provocateur
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, June 09 2006 @ 04:04 PM UTC
just becuase the infiltrator was a women is no reason to call her a bitch. You (hopefully) wouldn't call a gay infiltrator a faggot, or so on with different types of oppression. Call her all the non-oppresive foul things you can think of, becuase she deserves them.
FBI confidential informant also said to be provocateur
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, June 09 2006 @ 04:14 PM UTC
I call my gay friends faggot all the time. Nothing wrong with words themselves its the intended meaning behind the word. I also have called male friends bitches before and I think Ill call Anna A snitch ass bitch. That staement has nothing to do with her being a woman. Now can we stop with this PC bullshit?
FBI confidential informant also said to be provocateur
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, June 09 2006 @ 05:22 PM UTC
just because you havent come to terms with the fact that words can hurt
entire groups people doesnt mean calling people bitch or fag is ok, whether
or not your friends tell you its ok, bro.
FBI confidential informant also said to be provocateur
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, June 09 2006 @ 05:30 PM UTC
Cry me a fucking river
FBI confidential informant also said to be provocateur
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, June 09 2006 @ 06:34 PM UTC
i like how you cant argue against me so you resort to things like giving it a
label such as 'pc bullshit' and avoiding a discussion you know you look like a
fool in by saying 'cry me a fucking river'.
why not debate the points rather than avoid it? or are you incapable of
critical thought? i wouldnt be suprised, you make yourself sound like a
meathead.
FBI confidential informant also said to be provocateur
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, June 10 2006 @ 01:53 AM UTC
is this thread actually hapenning???
FBI confidential informant also said to be provocateur
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, July 20 2006 @ 11:27 AM UTC
These aren't your friends. This is a totally public space, and you should learn to be polite in public.
FBI confidential informant also said to be provocateur
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, June 09 2006 @ 12:34 PM UTC
The feds didnt release the information. March Reichel did. He is Eric McDavid's Lawyer, and im assuming that he has been investigating the person who was working to entrap his client, and thats how he knows her wherabouts. The extent of her work with the FBI will be shown when she is forced to testify when the case goes to trial.
FBI confidential informant also said to be provocateur
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, June 17 2006 @ 05:09 PM UTC
ive been in contact with reichel, and he claims he never said that 'anna' was in iowa. he has no idea about her whereabouts. im from des moines. i think this discussion is a little ahead of itself, and will do little to help anything, and more to cause paranoia.
FBI confidential informant also said to be provocateur
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, June 09 2006 @ 12:57 PM UTC
I'm not trying to be ridiculous and pc, but its absurd that someone has to fall back on calling her a "fucking bitch." If it was a male infilitrator would you call him a "bitch-ass fag" or something?
FBI confidential informant also said to be provocateur
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, June 09 2006 @ 01:05 PM UTC
yeah youd think we could just call her fed or snitch or pig or something. those are all worse and not sexist.
FBI confidential informant also said to be provocateur
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, June 09 2006 @ 03:16 PM UTC
thats ridicliously pc... she is a fucking bitch... yeah i said it.. fuck her... straight up
FBI confidential informant also said to be provocateur
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, June 09 2006 @ 03:19 PM UTC
you can call "her" all the names you want. i think the real issue is how to keep this bullshit from happening.
FBI confidential informant also said to be provocateur
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, June 09 2006 @ 04:22 PM UTC
A bitch is a contemptible women. Its not so much a sexist word as an anthropocentric word. Substituting pig is just the same. But come on, this is a boring debate. Language is flexible and we use it in different ways.

FBI confidential informant also said to be provocateur
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, June 09 2006 @ 06:19 PM UTC
I am a women, and I say she is a fucking bitch. We need to stop all this pc shit and get all these fucking snitches the hell out of our movement. Grow the fuck up people.
FBI confidential informant also said to be provocateur
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, June 09 2006 @ 09:14 PM UTC
Exactly: GROW UP and stop mouthing slogans as if they said something other than your ersatz identity, a pretty pitiful thing at that.
Lingustics for Anarchists
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, June 09 2006 @ 09:25 PM UTC
"I am a women [sic], and I say she is a fucking bitch. We need to stop all this pc shit and get all these fucking snitches the hell out of our movement. Grow the fuck up people."

I don't really think there's any maturity in being persistently insensitive to other people's concerns over harsh language and denigrating them as "pc" (which, actually, the RIGHT WING does with gloriously arrogant regularity and ALSO claims that they're somehow being mature). Also, no one disagrees that we need to get all these fucking snitches the hell out of the anarchist movement.

It's totally understandable, in my opinion, for a woman to call another woman "bitch" or a black person calling another black person "nigga" or whatever, and in some (probably many) social contexts and communities it may be acceptable for men to call women "bitch" (or men to call other men "bitch", like, for example in queer communities) or for non-black people to use the N-word... and sometimes those things are hilarious. But seeing as the overwhelming majority of comments posted on Infoshop News are from anonymous strangers, and also considering that a LOT of people who post on Infoshop have no manners (interpret this as you will), then it's totally understandable for people to have concerns about the way language is used. Not that we should be really really formal or whatever, but you know.

Or, to put it another way: We could be more creative with our reactionary rage. Aren't anarchists creative people, after all?

Somebody pie me. I'm being a nerd. I'm going to go sleep furiously with my colorless green ideas now.

Honest Question
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, June 09 2006 @ 09:50 PM UTC
Language and insults aside, are you sure that's a woman?
PC
Authored by: Admin on Friday, June 09 2006 @ 10:21 PM UTC
What is more important, government disruption and repression of activists, or language used on some discussion board?

With priorities like these, it's no wonder that the authorities have an easy time picking on our movement.

Big picture, folks!
comic relief
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, June 10 2006 @ 12:01 AM UTC
there's no harm in dealing with fucked-up situations by venting. people say nasty shit in nasty situations. it happens. it ain't meant to be pretty.

and speech on the internet tends to be way more raunchy and vile and vulgar than speech in real life. there's no really good way to convey stuff like irony, or humor, or sarcasm, or just plain goofyness, or any other things like that, in an online text format.

people gotta take shit like that into account and i guess just deal with the vulgarity, and keep priorities in mind. but i also agree that lingustic creativity is a good thing. we need new curse words. really. vent, get creative and artsy with your venting, but fuckin' kick those motherfucking rat-ass snitches out!
Moderation
Authored by: Admin on Saturday, June 10 2006 @ 09:48 AM UTC
Post deleted for violation of the moderation policies (physical threat against a specific person). At this point, we will delete any further posts in this thread about the use of derogatory language.
comic relief
Authored by: Admin on Saturday, June 10 2006 @ 01:32 PM UTC
In case the above moderation warning wasn't clear enough--the discussion about language in this thread is closed. Any further posts about language or language in this thread will be automatically deleted.
FBI confidential informant also said to be provocateur
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, June 10 2006 @ 04:42 PM UTC
Are there any better pictures of her?
other photos...
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, June 10 2006 @ 05:09 PM UTC
There are some other photos... not nececessarily better, but...

http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2006/01/332735.shtml

... there's a few... and scroll down the page for another photo. so far, there aren't any photos of her i've seen without something covering parts of her face... damn.

other photos...
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, June 11 2006 @ 10:00 AM UTC
Folxs in Des Moines have met her in the past. She was alwaying asking about ALF actions localy but no one I talked to has seen her in awhile and they were suprised to hear she was still in town. I encouraged them to make a flier and hit up the all the spots and shows just to be on the safe side.