"Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth."

Welcome to Infoshop News
Thursday, May 23 2013 @ 03:49 AM CDT

Pentagon Attempting to Remove Restrictions on Spying in US

News ArchiveSubmitted by e:

Mission creep? A new bill could expand the Pentagon's ability to gather intelligence inside the United States

By Michael Isikoff
Investigative Correspondent


NewsweekJune 21 issue - Last February, two Army counterintelligence agents showed up at the University of Texas law school and demanded to see the roster from a conference on Islamic law held a few days earlier. Their reason: they were trying to track down students who the agents claimed had been asking "suspicious" questions. "I felt like I was in 'Law & Order'," said one student after being grilled by one of the agents. The incident provoked a brief campus uproar, and the Army later admitted the agents had exceeded their authority. But if the Pentagon has its way, the Army may not have to make such amends in the future.

Without any public hearing or debate, NEWSWEEK has learned, Defense officials recently slipped a provision into a bill before Congress that could vastly expand the Pentagon's ability to gather intelligence inside the United States, including recruiting citizens as informants.


Ever since the 1970s, when Army intel agents were caught snooping on antiwar protesters, military intel agencies have operated under tight restrictions inside the United States. But the new provision, approved in closed session last month by the Senate Intelligence Committee, would eliminate one big restriction: that they comply with the Privacy Act, a Watergate-era law that requires government officials seeking information from a resident to disclose who they are and what they want the information for.


The CIA always has been exempt—although by law it isn't supposed to operate inside the United States. The new provision would now extend the same exemption to Pentagon agencies such as the Defense Intelligence Agency—so they can help track terrorists. A report by the Senate Intelligence Committee says the provision would allow military intel agents to "approach potential sources and collect personal information from them" without disclosing they work for the government. The justification: "Current counterterrorism operations," the report explains, which require "greater latitude ... both overseas and within the United States."

DIA officials say they mainly want the provision so they can more easily question American businessmen and college students who travel abroad. But Pentagon spokesman Bryan Whitman concedes the provision will also be helpful in investigating suspected terrorist threats to military bases and contractors inside the United States. "It's a new world we live in," he says. "We have to do what is necessary for force protection."

Among those pushing for the provision, sources say, were officials at northcom, the new Colorado-based command set up by Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld to oversee "homeland defense." Pentagon lawyers insist agents will still be legally barred from domestic "law enforcement." But watchdog groups see a potentially alarming "mission creep." "This... is giving them the authority to spy on Americans," said Kate Martin, director of the Center for National Security Studies, a group frequently critical of the war on terror. "And it's all been done with no public discussion, in the dark of night."

Share
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Ask
  • Kirtsy
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Twitter
  • SlashDot
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Fark
  • Del.icio.us
  • Blogmarks
  • Yahoo Buzz
Pentagon Attempting to Remove Restrictions on Spying in US | 7 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
comment by James Anon
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, June 24 2004 @ 12:57 AM CDT
Between the Patriot Act and other laws in committee I think America is at very real risk of having a legal frame work for a rise in state fascist activity.

I don\'t live in the US but I feel genuinely worried for anarchist who do live there. Remember the legal and social ease of state crack downs on ie Black Bloc or ELF BEFORE 9/11.

I hope the US comrades fight these changes, we can already see them seeping into Australian government policy review.
comment by
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, June 24 2004 @ 09:50 AM CDT
resistance here, or at least that which i have been privy to, is fertile. we are a powerful movement, and this summer we will make waves, and perhaps get ourselves into bigger trouble than we have been in a long, long time.
comment by pr
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, June 24 2004 @ 01:11 PM CDT
If that is the James anon who works in the ATO then yes, your seeing them seeping in YEARS AFTER the states bought in practically all the PATRIOT repression and more in some cases. The states are all led by the local democrat party btw while the conservatives rule nationally.On contempt for civil liberties and human rights there is complete bi-partisanship policies. Those who are fighting this have been for years now and those who are lurkers were advised to stay underground years ago as well so welcome to the party pal!
Now will some anarchists who are not working in a federal TAX office join me in support of a second strike on the pentagon? The rest should probably stay underground as I suggested two years ago.
comment by Reverend Chuck0
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, June 24 2004 @ 04:01 PM CDT
You really shouldn\'t worry about us. Most of us are doing fine, but we will really screw ourselves if hold back out of irrational fear about the Patriot Act and so on. The good thing is that opposition to the Patriot Act is widespread and growing. We are a long way from a situation like 1930s America, with an FBI that had the support of the population. Almost all of us anarchists are able to do what we want to do, despite all of the hype to the contrary.
comment by
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, June 24 2004 @ 04:39 PM CDT
In my local area, the majority of the local police know I\'m an anarchist and I\'m on good terms with them. Right now there\'s no problems, there is relative peace, and things are quite good in my area. I consider myself lucky after reading what goes on outside my area. I hope that it doesn\'t come in my area and ruin the peaceful way of life. People have tried, but those people are no longer here.

All I know is as long as I can live the lifestyle I want to and it\'s not causing another person to not be able to survive, and may be helping other people survive, then I\'m happy. If something should prevent that then I\'ll do what I can to resist and send away that something so it doesn\'t hinder my or others\' survival and happiness again.

In the US here, I think anarchy is alive and well. We hear about the resistance to it so much because of the fact it\'s really on an upswing. If you hear nothing about it, only then you should start to worry.
comment by James Anon
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, June 25 2004 @ 09:25 PM CDT
These are encouraging remarks! America has one advantage over commonwealth nations in its constitution. Westminster Parliamentary Democracy models don\'t guarantee their citizens very many rights at all.

Perhaps people in the USA should understand that people outside the USA get a very scary feed of news about US politics. What we don\'t get is a mediating feeling of what it is really like to live in the US.

We get a lot of Law & Order and CSI Miami type programs where you\'d think in the US a quarter of the population is murdering another quarter and the other half is investigating it while trying to get onto American Idol by using their Super Ab-Crunch device and listening to Tony Robbins motivational tapes.
comment by James Anon
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, June 25 2004 @ 09:39 PM CDT
I\'m very interested how you made the connection between my pseudonym and the anarchist who works in the ATO! I\'m not him but I know him well.

The rest of you message is a little cryptic to be replied to directly but you do seem to be saying something nasty. Personally I don\'t think you have to be unemployed or working for a small feel good organization to be an anarchist.

Anarchist have to make a living some how and that includes working in an ATO call center. I know anarchists working in all sorts of jobs.

The only thing you can\'t do as anarchists is:

1) Employ others.

2) Be a capitalist manager, ie have the power to hire and fire.

3) Be a capitalist social manager, ie being a cop, prison guard etc (This is a grey area open to debate).

4) Be a member of the ruling class, ie living through expropriating the value of workers work using your capitalist assets.

I\'m sorry but working in a call center isn\'t any of these, even an ATO call center.

Your comment is obviously trying to divide \'real\' anarchists from \'sell out\' anarchists, please stop it! Focus on the real enemy.