"Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth."

Welcome to Infoshop News
Saturday, May 25 2013 @ 02:14 AM CDT

"Anybody But Bush": The Big Abdication

News ArchiveSubmitted by a:







Let me get straight to the point.

Following the strategy of "Anybody But Bush" in the upcoming presidential election is equally as dangerous as Bush getting re-elected.

Why? There are two basic reasons.

First, the "Anybody But Bush" (ABB) movement is predicated on the mistaken and illusory belief that Bush & Co. is an aberration from the American political system, rather than extensions of it.

Second, for progressives to submerge ourselves within the ABB tidal wave is a complete abdication of our responsibility as global citizens to agitate around the issues facing this country and the world, rather than once again believing that our work is limited to simply voting for the president every four years.

"These are the times that try men's souls," wrote Tom Paine, a seminal thinker during the birth of America. Today, these are times when the very souls of America and the entire planet are at stake. To think that in this post-9/11 reality we can go on with business as usual, believing that who is in the White House is the only cutting-edge issue, is patently absurd.

Given the debacle in Florida in 2000, the fact that the U.S. Supreme Court intervened in the last election, and the fact that suspect computerized voting machines are on their way, how much faith can we seriously have in the election process as a whole?

More importantly, though, we face today issues wherein the future of the planet is at stake. We know it and the powers-that-be know it too. Bush's election in 2000 was a reflection of the extent and depth of these fundamental problems. Bush's time in office and the policies flowing forth from his tenure – most dramatically the invasion and occupation of Iraq -- are attempts to stem the tide of America's decline.

With the world's oil reserves passing peak production capacities, the beachhead in Iraq is the keystone for both control of the majority of these reserves and the maintenance of our American lifestyle, such as it is these days. I cannot emphasize enough that this occupation (and eventual expansion) is a fundamental part of American global aspirations, and this WILL NOT change whether a Democrat is elected or Bush is re-elected!

Why? Because it cannot be reversed unless a complete re-evaluation and reassessment of America's ambitions toward empire is undertaken. What the ABB movement fails to recognize is that neither Dean nor Kerry nor Gephardt nor Clark are up to the task of dissecting the inner workings of American capitalism and its engine of globalization.

The likeliest scenario, given a Democrat being elected in November, is that they will spin the continued occupation of Iraq as "necessary" and "humane" because America needs to rebuild the country that it destroyed.

So, unlike Vietnam, where "stopping communism" was the rationale, this time the rationale will be "fixing the mess that Bush left us." Different storyline, but the result will be years of continued occupation and control of the region's oil.

The extremism that is the Bush regime is really a mirror into the extreme nature of the situation facing us all. Below all the political machinations, all the dire warnings of economic collapse, renewed plans for nuclear wars, global warming, etc., is the fact that the system that brought us all the benefits of modernity has now revealed its darkest shadow: the absolute commodification of every aspect of our lives, our relationships to each other and our environment. The American Way has brought us to the ultimate precipice.

Despite the extreme difficulty that we humans have in breaking the bonds of habit, inertia, and mesmerization with the status quo, it is time for we, the people, to begin the deep soul-searching, soul-wrenching inquiry and debate over how we reclaim our humanity.

Ultimately, it is NOT the economy, stupid; NOT the environment; NOT foreign policy; NOT even the occupation of Iraq that demands our deepest attention. And it is certainly NOT about uncritically "taking back America."

Important as some of these may be, these are but the symptoms of a greater and more deadly infection: our complete dissociation from our world, each other, and even our own hearts.

This election year could be an amazing opportunity to take a hard look at where humankind has come from and where we are heading. This is the orientation that our elected representatives need to have as well. To drown the nascent potential that these next few months could offer in the staid waters of "Anybody But Bush" is one more crime we inflict on ourselves and on the planet.

And we inflict it at our own peril.

T. Patrick Donovan is a doctoral student in depth Psychology. He can be reached at feelslikerain9@yahoo.com
Share
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Ask
  • Kirtsy
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Twitter
  • SlashDot
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Fark
  • Del.icio.us
  • Blogmarks
  • Yahoo Buzz
"Anybody But Bush": The Big Abdication | 17 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
comment by Morpheus
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, February 15 2004 @ 11:20 AM CST
If the democrats nominated Adolf Hitler the \"anybody but Bush\" crowd would vote for him.
comment by Reverend Chuck0
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, February 15 2004 @ 11:37 AM CST
And short-sighted liberals would write articles asking Ralph Nader to not run against Hitler. ;-)

Am I the only one smelling a backlash against the ABB brand of politics?
comment by
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, February 15 2004 @ 12:56 PM CST
\"What the ABB movement fails to recognize is that neither Dean nor Kerry nor Gephardt nor Clark are up to the task of dissecting the inner workings of American capitalism and its engine of globalization.\"

While Bush may have been touting free trade during the last elections, you still can\'t ignore the fact his economic policy hasn\'t been globalization friendly. Kudos for making the distinction between globalization and capitalism though.
comment by Red Hughs
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, February 15 2004 @ 01:56 PM CST
Please,

The people who criticize the Anybody But Bush movement naturally don\'t realize that no one who would stop the war could ever be elected.

Just participating in elections puts you on the slippery slop of exchanging different \"lesser evils\" till you up supporting \"anybody but Bush\" or Bush himself against Hitler or whatever...

RH

http://www.webcom.com/maxang


comment by norulers
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, February 15 2004 @ 02:01 PM CST
\"Why? Because it cannot be reversed unless a complete re-evaluation and reassessment of America\'s ambitions toward empire is undertaken. What the ABB movement fails to recognize is that neither Dean nor Kerry nor Gephardt nor Clark are up to the task of dissecting the inner workings of American capitalism and its engine of globalization.\"

I agree with most every thing this writer has to say but there is this part but seems to make the issue blurry. That is: are the politicians the rich elites? or the ruling class elites? or a combination of the two?

I am of the oppion that the government is nothing but the puppets of the elitist. People such as Rockerfella , Rothchilds, and Carnagie ect., ect.,are the rich elite who could and would crush any government or political official who is unable to pay back barrowed money from them to subdue their projected foe.

That is to say that the rich elites are the money lenders who sponsor wars to those governments who are a pretty sure bet that they will defeat those they appose. They are able to make their greatest \"profits\" in this way.

The money lenders do not really care so much as to which government wins in a war, only that they invest in the most powerful who can subdue the people and make them submit so to assure that they will pay their \"increased\" taxes (so called) for years to come (submissively with fear) which the government uses pays back with interest these elitist money lenders.

My point is that this writer assumes that the politicians could reverse the inner workings of American capitalism and its engine of globalization if \"re-evaluate and reassessment of america\'s ambitions towards empire is undertaken.\"

This is bogus if the rich elitist are those who are truly ruling the world.(and i believe they are) Politicians would never do anything that might negate support for them from the money lenders.

Ok, beyond this piont I\'m making (if I made myself clear at all) I appreciated this article for its pointing out that ABB is a huge mistake and lacks a through critique of the situation which the writer articulated well.
comment by Reverend Chuck0
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, February 15 2004 @ 02:23 PM CST
The \"ABB\" movement is just another example of the idiocy of American liberalism and the short-sighted, ahistorical thinking that rules the radical left that goes running to the Democrats every four years. While the Bush administration certainly seems fascist at times, it\'s important to remember that a Democratic regime wouldn\'t be much different. Many of the things that we attribute to the Bush regime were started under Bill Clinton. The police were militarized under Clinton, who also tried to put 100,000 more cops on the streets. The police were beating us up and spying on us before Bush took office. The Seattle riots happened while Bush was president. Remember that Clinton signed the 1996 Telecommunications Act that made things nicer for media consolidation. Intellectual property restrictions got worse under Clinton. Clinton intervened militarily in Haiti, Yugoslavia, Sudan, and Afghanistan. Let\'s remember how many Iraqis were killed by U.S. sanctions that were kept in place during the Clinton/Albright regime.

Hopefully, some of our radical friends who are into this \"ABB\" stuff will come to their senses when the Democrats nominate another corporation-friendly, capitalist candidate. In the meantime, the rest of us should keep fighting for something better than this current state of nonsense in the USA.
comment by
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, February 15 2004 @ 02:26 PM CST
the great thing about clinton was that his administration made evident the fallacy of liberalism and electoral politics. as long as someone like bush is in office counter-systemic political activity can be coopted by the liberals, democrats, et-al as they try and position themselves as oppositional. but when they do take power and continue enacting the same policies more fundamental (radical) critiques of the system become evident to many. the whole mirage of the american system is falling apart and the faster the better.

personally, im going to vote for kerry. not because i think he\'s going to make a big difference but because I think that if he is elected our critiques and political orientation will grow much faster and will be able to escape just reacting to everything the bushies do.
comment by norulers
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, February 15 2004 @ 02:26 PM CST
Sorry! I wished I had edited that post a bit better. My sentences are some times fragmented because of being in a hurry. Again I appologize. Also I left out a few thoughts that i will now add.

Interest rate returns for (blood) monies loaned to govn\'ts. for war are far more pofitable then any other loan. The conquoring of people assure the elitist will be paid back their blood monies extracted from those who have been murdered and robbed.

The rich elitist have no more respect for the govenors then they do for the skid row bum accept that they are able to efficiently rob and murder and extract monies to repay their loans which the elitist will loan out again.
comment by Reverend Chuck0
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, February 15 2004 @ 03:25 PM CST
\"...if he is elected our critiques and political orientation will grow much faster...\"

I hate to pierce your bubble, but things just don\'t work that way. The only way that our political ideas and critiques will spread is if we take an active role in doing the things (outreach, education, direct action) that make things happen. We cannot afford to adopt the fatalist ideologies of middle class leftists who spend their days wondering when the right historical opportunities will arise to provide a healthy climate for radicalism. It doesn\'t matter who the U.S. president is, because we have to pursue our politics irregardless.
comment by ctresca
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, February 15 2004 @ 08:55 PM CST
Having Bush out of office will lift a major psychological weight off of a lot of our shoulders.
comment by Mike
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, February 16 2004 @ 03:31 AM CST
The left-liberals aren\'t surprised that Bush is acting like a right-wing imperialistic thug. They will be surprised when Kerry is acting like a right-wing imperialistic thug. (I think the most likely result by now).

This will split them into two: (1) the \'but he\'s really our own imperialistic thug\' camp which will continue to support him and (2) the \'ok, now how do we get rid of this guy?\' camp which will explore alternatives.

The roblem is to make anarchism one of those alternatives. We need to avoid both electoral entanglements and anti-electoral fundamentalism. I think it is quite reasonable to cooperate on the ground with certain left-liberal groups, including voters\' rights groups, which have a snowball\'s chance in hell of succeeding but every chance of smashing their own and other\'s illusions.
comment by Christopher Day
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, February 16 2004 @ 10:09 AM CST
Bravo Mike!

Understanding the twin dangers of electoral entanglements and anti-electoral fundamentalism is key to charting a strategic response to the elections. Similarly appreciating the need many folks have to go through the process of having their illusions about the Dems smashed is also important.

When the 2,000th U.S. soldier comes home in a box from Iraq under President Kerry we will be in a much better position to build a mass extra-electoral movement than if that were to occur under Bush.
comment by
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, February 16 2004 @ 10:16 AM CST
don
comment by norulers
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, February 16 2004 @ 01:09 PM CST
Democrats and republicans are two cheeks of the same ass. Don\'t vote take direct action.
comment by
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, February 16 2004 @ 04:05 PM CST
vote , but vote NOBODY majority
not vote and dirrect action is an end goal but to do a action of voting for what we really want Nobody would be ok by me and i wonder how many other people would be energized by such, or maybe the computerized ballots are already too rigged and would never even count this and having bush for 4 more would make people see just how bad it can get. or kerry and just how bad in other ways under the same athoritarian statist game it could get.
Reclaim ourselves!
comment by ishi psychology broker
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, February 17 2004 @ 07:48 AM CST

a doctoral student in depth psychology writing in \'dissident\' voice about how ABB etc is not very critical of the status quo?

well, anyone getting a PHD is as committed to a status quo as anyone committed to politics. maybe its not the same one---maybe he can make a case that its a lesser evil one. so i guess he is preaching that we should not fall into the trap of distinguishing that status quo\'s \'lesser of 2 evils\' while we are supposed to ignore this individual\'s commitment to the academic status quo.
he is going to go around preaching from his ivory tower pulpit that people should criticize their elitist political system. like catholics with their hierarchy of sin----abortion and gays are real bad, while building a vatican on the backs of the poor is a trivial issue, as is running a church prositution ring. in the eyes of god, and the state, only the real sins are important.

and we are supposed to ignore his commitement to a status quo, and social climbing into a leadership and class priviledge position. \'isnt bush a shit\'. \'arent psychologists such nice people who help people, for a fee, make it through the workday since no PhD would consider doing that job----so you do it, and i get a cut explaining to you why its not that bad if you have an in\'depth\' view.\'. like a stock broker who manages mney, he helps people manage time.

he is worried about the abuse that \'they\' do. while he is a simple person, getting his PhD so he can get a more elite job, avoid military service, etc.

well, its not just \'them\'. and talking about \'their sin\' does not excuse your own commitments.

so, thinking about how \'mankind got where we are\' is a nice idea, but the above does not count, nor does getting your own PhD and office count.
asnd actually this is why we have oil wars. they are fighting for you. bush might come in your office and tell you that \'psychology\' now is say officially a branch of eugenics, or something. kerry might have to get the black vote, so he would permit you to teach something else (eg equality). so its a lesser of evils----for the shrink, the issue might be how much you care about \'psychology\'. whether it bothers you signing off on death camps for some, or a few more or a few less. most people, like the US army guys, basically dont care so long as they get the check. psychologists i think are no diffrent.


( also exactly what is \'depth psychology\' apart from another scam? why not put it on infoshop so other people dont have to waste money paying overpaid professors and academic adminstrators and government insitutuons to find out their \'secrets of the universe\' and how to profit from them.)

probably getting a phD is a lesser of 2 evils; beats temp work. but its a lesser of evil so if one wants to really have a critique of the system of institutional violence it cannot be segregated into what goes on in DC.
comment by John
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, February 20 2004 @ 11:58 AM CST
I for one am fascinated by the intellectual analyses applied to the upcoming election. I too am perplexed by the choices. (Pardon my spelling if I blow it - there is no spell checker here and I\'m not going to spend the time looking through my dictionary). I was \'born and raised\' a Republican, and went through Watergate being an apologist for all Republican wrongdoing. Then I hated Carter for letting those who lived out the Vietnam War in Canada (the day I went into the service - because I thought it was necessary and patriotic to follow the wishes of my family and government - a fraternity brother took off for Canada. I spent my tour \'across the pond\' and fortunately did not \'buy the farm\' there). I thought Ronnie would be \'the man\', then he did away with the 5 mph bumper to save the industry a couple bucks. Then the right wing started the campaign to make him a saint (which is taking longer than they expected). I couldn\'t vote for Clinton (I thought George was a wooss) because of concientious objector position during Vietnam (I didn\'t read enough during or after the war). But then the right wing, and a lot of others (but I will attribute the bulk of the responsibility to them) decided the president should be removed from office because he lied to the authorities (including that righteous body, Congress) about the young lady crawling around on her hands and knees under his desk. And weren\'t several right wingers who were shaking their fingers at him with the loudest \'No No\'s\' caught doing the same goddamn thing. They just crawled under the rug as they should have. Then we get to GW, and the right wing emphasize the \'W\' so the world will not confuse him with his father, who I no longer think of as poorly as I once did. In fact I think the family secretly wishes that acorn had turned into a straight thinking solid oak rather than a special interest influenced hybrid. The interests of going to war were obviously more dominant than any interest in prewar modeling of the aftermath. He had no clue about what might happen after he dashed across the flight deck looking like some clown in a flight suit and declared to the world and the US electorate that he had won the war, proving to no one that he was not a coward during the Vietnam War and deserved somehow to be anointed \'Commander In Chief\'.

I don\'t have difficulty with voting for a Democrat this time because the devil I don\'t know is certainly less dangerous than the devil we all know.